Have you missed me? Trick question; I know you’ve missed me. Frankly, the main reason I haven’t been writing is laziness. I make no bones about it. The second reason is that I got hit by a car in April and broke four bones in my hand, and the third is that I had a very outdoorsy summer (after my hand healed), and the fourth is that I have a girlfriend to occupy my free time now, and the fifth is that the world has gone insane.

I mean, what am I even supposed to write about? What am I supposed to say? How am I supposed to point to one stupid thing to focus on — like the fact that Solar Roadways’ website suddenly doesn’t work because haha fuck them — when the real-life things that are happening are so much stupider? The world is an Onion headline and I can’t even pick a place to start.

So let’s start with some morons in a boat!

No politics here (though I’m sure if you squint you can find a way to accuse me of racism or sexism or something), just me and my lifetime of sailing experience, including nearly five years living on a boat, against these two idiots.

Those two are named Jennifer Appel and Tasha Fuiava, and their story has been everywhere recently. Here’s their account of what happened, in brief:

They set off from Hawaii in May of this year, bound for Tahiti. They were caught in a storm that both ruined their engine and rendered their mast and sails useless. They were unable to contact help. They drifted for five months, living off of dry food and a handheld watermaker (takes the salt out of seawater so you can drink it) until they were rescued by a fishing boat and, eventually, the Navy.

Now here’s how much of their story makes sense:

They left Hawaii in May. They were rescued five months later by the Navy.

That’s it. That’s the only portion of their story that has even a shred of credibility to it. Now, I’m not going to speculate as to their motives yet, but I will point out that the world of open-water sailing is an obscure one to most people. I am one of a small minority to have spent a lot of time sailing on the open ocean, out of sight of land for months at a time. So I don’t blame journalists for not catching these things at first sight. But that’s why I’m here to explain them to you.

1. Food

These women were able to survive because they had vast stores of dry food on board —mainly oatmeal, pasta, and rice. I’m going to assume that they’re giving an incomplete picture of what they ate, because if that’s all they had they would have died. No question. The human body cannot live on carbs alone for five months, nor can the two dogs they had on board with them. Even ignoring the essential nutrients like vitamins, there are eight amino acids from protein and fats (11 for dogs) that the body cannot synthesize, without which you will die in a couple of months. Unfortunately, the Nazis performed just such an experiment, so we know this to be true.

So I’ll assume they also had some Centrum Silver and canned sardines on board that they didn’t talk about that kept them from dying. What I’m more concerned about is how they didn’t just starve to death.

See, most news outlets who’ve reported on this story say they had a year’s worth of food on board. The Independent quotes Appel as follows:

“They [experienced sailors in Hawaii] said pack every square inch of your boat with food, and if you think you need a month, pack six months, because you have no idea what could possibly happen out there.”

Not to put too fine a point on it, but that is utter horseshit. In my time living on boats, I undertook literally hundreds of overnight passages. Probably a dozen of them took more than a few days, and six took more than a week. One took two weeks, one took three. And at no point in those five years did anyone ever advise us to carry six times as much food as we might need, let alone 12. You see, the passage from Hawaii to Tahiti is 2600 miles.

Capture
Tahiti is very small, you’re going to have to trust me on this one.

In a boat like theirs (we’ll get to the boat), 120 miles in 24 hours is a very reasonable pace to expect. That’s a passage of 21 days. Three weeks. And you packed food for a year? That doesn’t make sense. An inexperienced sailor wouldn’t have thought to do that, and an experienced one would have known it wasn’t necessary.

And then there’s the matter of carrying that much food. Luckily, Costco sells a year’s worth of food, so we know what it looks like.

Untitled-1

That’s a year’s worth of food, for four people, at 1300 calories per person. For two people, it’s 2600 calories a day, which is a very reasonable amount to eat when you’re out at sea, moving around, pumping a hand desalinator all day long. It comes on a pallet and weighs 1800 pounds, and is an absolutely ludicrous amount of food to bring on board a 50-foot boat. These people were vastly overprepared in the food department.

But weirdly, they claim to have gone through 90% of their food by the time they were rescued. So did they bring six months’ supply or a year? And how did they go through it so quickly?

2. Water

You can’t drink seawater. More specifically, you can, but it’ll kill you, and pretty quickly at that. Appel claims that they made water using a desalinator, presumably a handheld one like this.

41WPHF132EL

That one will put out about a quart an hour. So mow much do they need?

Let’s assume that they’re each eating 1500 calories a day, and the two dogs are eating that between them (again, ignoring the fact that dogs can’t survive on a carb-only diet). That’s 4500 calories a day of oatmeal, pasta, and rice. They didn’t tell us how much of each they ate, but I did some poking around and found that 1000 calories of rice needs about three cups of water to prepare, while 1000 calories of oatmeal needs about 12. Pasta is somewhere in the middle. Let’s average it out to about 6 cups of water (1.5 quarts) per 1000 calories of food.

So for 4500 calories a day, they need 6.75 quarts of water. Now, how about drinking water? All the info I found said that humans need around two quarts a day, though they can survive on one quart a day if it’s absolutely necessary and they’re not exposed to too much sun. At two quarts a day, between them and the dogs, that’s another six quarts a day for a total of 12.75 quarts. That means between them, they’re operating the watermaker literally all day long. Granted, the boat had water tanks, but I don’t know how big they were. And if you’re outside in the sun, trying to fix the boat, working up a sweat, etc., those needs will go up. Surviving would be a struggle.

[EDIT 11/1/17: there are a ton of other desalinator options on the market that would meet their needs more easily, though they didn’t specify what kind they used. It also appears they have a wind generator in some of the photos, which might have made enough power to run an electric one, depending on conditions. Safe to assume water wasn’t an issue.]

Which brings me to my next point:

3. Their Condition

Take another look at these women.

45BD927E00000578-5023025-image-m-36_1509115447812

These are not women who are struggling to survive. They have not been dehydrated, or even operating at a caloric deficit, for five months.

vsa7xehsk9waasga9lx0

They are healthy enough to stand up and blow kisses at their rescuers, and the dog still has visible, healthy muscle tone.

hlb0rz0bvlg54k4kvznm

They are healthy enough to climb long ladders unassisted while smiling enthusiastically.

Do you see my point? These women and their dogs aren’t starving. They’re not close. They’re not even skinny. They have visible subcutaneous fat. Their faces are plump, not sunken and emaciated. Their skin isn’t burned, their lips aren’t chapped, there is no indication whatsoever that they’ve been through any kind of hardship. The dogs have shiny coats and strong muscles.

For contrast, I present Maurice and Maralyn Bailey.

175a

In 1973, their boat was sunk by a whale in the Pacific. They collected seawater and ate birds, fish, and turtles. They were out for 117 days (less than four months) before being rescued, and they each lost forty pounds. They look like Holocaust survivors. Jennifer Appel and Taisha Fuiva haven’t lost an ounce.

4. The Storm

Let’s backtrack to how they got stranded in the first place. They left Hawaii on May 3, and hit trouble right away. Appel claims they hit a storm with “force 11” winds on their first night.

Spinal_Tap_-_Up_to_Eleven
I had to.

“Force 11” is a reference to the Beaufort Scale, a somewhat archaic but still widely used scale of wind strength that goes from 1-12. 12 is a hurricane, 11 is 64-72 mph winds. Think about putting your hand out the window on the highway and you’ll know how scary that might be. The thing is, they say this happened on the first night. If they left at dawn on May 3, that means they’re at most 18 hours from Hawaii, or about 90 miles. And the highest wind speed that Hawaii experienced that entire week was under 30 mph. And that weather data is from Bradshaw Air Field, way up on Mauna Kea, so it’s not sheltered at all. Is it completely impossible that they were experiencing 70 mph winds less than 100 miles from the island? No. But it is profoundly unlikely.

Apparently, that storm rendered the sails unusable. Some reporters said that the mast “broke,” which it clearly didn’t, but I’ll let that slide as ignorant reporting. Pictures of the boat are a little suspicious, though.

Capture2

The mast is still upright, and the forestay, backstay, and shrouds (wires that hold the mast up) are still intact. The boom is still attached. The mainsail is down and, though sloppily folded, isn’t obviously damaged. The jib is neatly rolled, and both sheets are still attached. There is absolutely no indication that this boat isn’t capable of moving under its own power. I know I’m not on the boat and I haven’t examined it myself, but I’ve seen booms break. I’ve seen masts break. I’ve seen sails blow out. It is shockingly violent, and you are absolutely not able to put the sails away afterward in the way that these sails have been stowed.

[EDIT 11/1/17: one source mentions a damaged spreader, a structural component of the mast that I can’t assess from the photos. A damaged spreader might have prevented them from running at full sail in strong winds, but would not have immobilized the boat by any means. If the jib was intact, and it certainly seems to be, any competent sailor could have gotten the boat moving.]

Around May 30, Appel says they hit a second storm. Now, at this point, it’s been 27 days since they left. They should be there by now. To make the trip in 27 days requires a pace of only 96 miles a day. That is, by any boat’s standards, a snail’s pace. It’s an average speed of four knots, and that’s how long it would take to cover the entire distance to Tahiti. So where the fuck are they on May 30? Granted, you can only expect about 500 miles of range out of a marine motor, but if your sails are rendered unusable on May 3, you’re still 2500 miles from Tahiti, you’re only 90 miles from Hawaii, and you have to know your engine won’t get you to Tahiti, why wouldn’t you turn back?

Grudgingly, let’s move past that. Let’s assume they’re barely crawling south, under engine power only, knowing full well the engine can’t take them that far, and they’re somewhere in this region.

Capture3

From CNN’s video:

“we had no way to realize that we were about to enter a typhoon that had winds of 100 to 150 miles an hour and minimum wave heights of 40-foot height.”

Nope. Bullshit. Absolute bullshit. There is no fucking way that this is what happened. Firstly, look back at the boat. That mainsail is stowed very sloppily. It’s not folded right or lashed down properly. There’s no sail cover, for which I can think of no justification. It has many folds and loose parts for the winds to catch. 100-mph winds would have shredded that like a cat shreds toilet paper.

giphy
Here is a helpful visual aid.

Same goes for that canvas awning over the cockpit. That awning is probably 3’x4′ at the end, so using the formula F = 1/2(rho)*v^2*A*C for wind load, the awning is experiencing at least 4500 pounds of pressure on it. If the wind is dead on, it’s closer to 9000. There is simply no chance in hell that that boat, as it looks there, has been through 100+mph winds.

But don’t take my word for it. Turns out we keep track of these things. Let’s assume that despite their broken sails, they were still motoring south toward Tahiti. They’ve explicitly said that they decided not to turn back. There were only four hurricanes in the Pacific this year with winds in the Cat 3 or Cat 4 range like Appel describes, and SURPRISE, none of them happened until mid-July.

6ab5d95b9d4e607e5cca8e1426114d09

Also, none of them were within a thousand miles of this boat, but does that even matter at this point?

800px-2017_Pacific_hurricane_season_summary_map

So let’s recap. They left Hawaii on May 3. That night, they claim to have experienced Force 11 (~70mph) winds. That almost certainly didn’t happen. They claim that this storm rendered their sails unusable, which also almost certainly didn’t happen. Rather than turning back and limping home to Hawaii in less than a day on motor power alone like any sane sailor would have — and remember, Appel claims to have decades of sailing experience — they decided to press on, hoping for … what? The motor would have crapped out less than halfway there. The sails were unusable (again, I don’t believe them, but that’s what they say). There was absolutely no hope of getting where they needed to go, but they say they kept going for 27 days.

What were they doing for 27 days? God knows. They weren’t motoring. The motor in a boat like that is good for maybe 200 hours on a tank. Call it 10 days of barely puttering along. And then what? Two weeks of drifting? And only then, on May 30, 27 days after the first storm and 17 days after running out of fuel, the second storm of 100+ mph winds hit. That definitely didn’t happen, as evidenced by the boat itself and all of the weather data that we keep on big storms. Apparently, that storm “flooded” the motor, rendering it unusable. Only then, according to their story, were they truly stranded. But the motor couldn’t possibly have been functioning that long anyway, so what does it matter if it broke? None of this makes sense. But I’m not done yet.

5. Communication

Let’s talk about how one would signal for help in a situation like this. Several stories talk about how their cell phone fell overboard, but that’s completely irrelevant because it would have been useless a few hours into the trip so I’ll ignore it. From the same CNN video:

“We had no VHF — no range on it — no weather comm, no SSB, we didn’t have our HAM radio, and our radio telephone inside the boat was not working, also our Iridium sat phone was not working”

Let’s break those down.

VHF

51EnrCEdsYL._SL500_AC_SS350_

Stands for Very High Frequency radio, and is probably the most common radio used in the boating world for everything from day-to-day communication to emergencies. It’s basically line-of-sight though, so they weren’t close enough to use it. That checks out.

“Weather comm”

No idea what this means. You get weather reports on the open ocean via some other form of radio, not a separate piece of hardware, so I’m not sure what she means here.

SSB

ic-m700pro_02251403

Stands for Single Side Band radio, and is also extremely common for open-water sailors. If you’re ever out of sight of land, you probably have one of these. It bounces signals off of the ionosphere, meaning it can transmit past the curvature of the earth. Theoretically, it has a range of thousands of miles. That’s how you’d normally get weather reports out in the middle of nowhere. Apparently it was broken.

Ham

Ham radio really just means amateur radio. It covers a broader array of wavelengths than SSB, though in a marine context those won’t have the range either. In practical terms, ham radio and marine SSB are the same thing.

[EDIT 11/1/17: The reason I say that ham and marine SSB are the same thing is that on the open ocean, they’re both using SSB frequencies, so it wouldn’t make sense to have two separate pieces of hardware. You could, though.]

Same frequency band, same hardware. The only difference is who you’re allowed to talk to and what licensing you need. It makes no sense at all to say that both of them were broken, since they wouldn’t be two separate radios in the first place.

“Radio telephone”

Radio telephone is more of a system than a piece of hardware. It’s also known as ship-to-shore, and it’s pretty much obsolete. Basically you radio to a shore station, and the shore station operator calls someone on the phone and holds the phone up to the radio. It’s slightly more sophisticated than that, but not much. It also uses SSB frequencies. You can get ones that look like a walkie-talkie, but more likely you’d just use your onboard SSB. In any case, this was apparently also broken.

Iridium sat phone

Iridium-9555-Satellite-Phone-front

Iridium is a brand of satellite phone. It should theoretically work anywhere in the world except underground, but it also apparently wasn’t working. Maybe it was out of battery.

The last resort, if all of these fail and you can’t get help, is called an EPIRB. EPIRB stands for Emergency Position-Indicating Radio Beacon, and is hooked to a global network of GPS satellites. It looks like an really big walkie-talkie, usually with only one switch on it (“on”), and sometimes comes with other shit like a strobe light, orange dye, etc. It is utterly bombproof, waterproof, and foolproof. Some of them are even water-activated, so if you sink, it starts automatically.

10406908

When the nuclear holocaust happens and everything is ash, there will still be EPIRBs blinking away somewhere.

When an EPIRB turns on, it sends a signal to its satellite network. If you’re within 5000 miles of the Equator (70% of the Earth), it’ll be in range. It might take up to 45 minutes to lock on to a signal, and then another three minutes to alert emergency services. At that point, since you have to register an EPIRB to buy it, it’ll tell them not only where you are, but who you are and what kind of boat you have. It’s accurate to within 50 yards, updates every 20 minutes, and runs for 48 hours. After the EPIRB was activated, a Coast Guard plane from Hawaii could have reached this boat in six hours.

USCG_C130_Hercules
This has a range of almost 5,000 miles and there are four of them on Oahu right now.

The Navy could have been there in two days. So what about Appel’s EPIRB?

She didn’t even fucking turn it on.

Jennifer Appel confirmed in an interview Tuesday that they had the beacon and did not use it. She said that in her experience, it should be used only when you are in imminent physical danger and going to die in the next 24 hours.

“Our hull was solid, we were floating, we had food, we had water, and we had limited maneuverable capacity,” Appel said in Japan, where the U.S. Navy took them after they were rescued by a Navy ship. “All those things did not say we are going to die. All that said, it’s going to take us a whole lot longer to get where we’re going.”

No, woman, that is not how that works. You do not wait until you are hours from death to turn on the EPIRB, because it will probably take longer than that to get rescued. If you are stranded, you turn on the fucking beacon. If your sails and motor are broken, you turn on the fucking beacon. If you’re running out of food, you turn on the fucking beacon. And if, as you say in this video, you “honestly didn’t believe that we would survive another 24 hours,” you TURN ON YOUR FUCKING BEACON.

Philip R. Johnson, a retired Coast Guard officer, weighed in on their situation as well.

If the thing was operational and it was turned on, a signal should have been received very, very quickly that this vessel was in distress,” Phillip R. Johnson said Monday in a telephone interview from Washington state.

Appel and Fuiava also said they had six forms of communication that all failed to work.

“There’s something wrong there,” Johnson said. “I’ve never heard of all that stuff going out at the same time.”

The absolute worst case scenario, even if the month of May went as badly as they say it did (which is impossible), is that they turn on their EPIRB after the hurricane (that didn’t exist) hit them on May 30 (which it didn’t), and they’re home before Mother’s Day. There is absolutely no reason for their summer to have unfolded as it did. As the Denver Post put it, “Key elements of the women’s account are contradicted by authorities, and are not consistent with weather reports or basic geography of the Pacific Ocean.”

6. The Sharks

I know we’re 3500 words deep at this point, but we’re going to have to take a second to talk about the sharks.

tmp668615241583558656

Repeatedly, Appel mentions being in “a tiger shark location.” The phrase “shark-infested” has been thrown around. Tiger sharks are coastal animals, but you know what? I’ll grant that maybe there were sharks out there. That’s when it gets ridiculous.

“We were slowly maneuvering through their living room. They came by to slap their tails and tell us we needed to move along. They decided to use our vessel to teach their children how to hunt. They attacked at night. We were just incredibly lucky that our hull was strong enough to withstand the onslaught.”

“I’m telling you I’ve never seen any Stanley Cup winner come even close to the precision these five sharks had. Three would get on one side and two would get on the other side, and they would make waves and try to knock down the boat.”

“I told [the dogs] not to bark because the sharks could hear us breathing. They could smell us”

This is such utter and complete nonsense that I hardly know where to begin, so I’ll just do bullet points.

  • Tiger sharks are solitary.
  • Very few sharks hunt in packs. Tiger sharks are not among them (sand tiger sharks aren’t the same thing).
  • Sharks occasionally ram boats, but the chances of it breaching the hull are zero. Here is a much bigger shark ramming a much smaller boat and it still can’t overturn it. A 50-foot boat like that probably weighs 20 tons, and a big tiger shark weighs maybe half a ton. Plus, sharks only have cartilage, not bones. There’s no big, hard surface like a whale’s head to bash into stuff.
  • Sharks don’t teach their children how to hunt. They lay eggs and leave.
    [EDIT 10/31/17: Tiger sharks are one of the shark species that give live birth. The teaching thing stands.]
  • Sharks ABSOLUTELY do not coordinate to make waves to knock boats over. You are thinking of killer whales, which have nothing in common with tiger sharks except living in the ocean. This would require the ability to make waves, the coordination to make one big wave, some concept of how boats work, and sophisticated enough communication to organize the whole thing. Sharks have none of those things.
  • EVEN IF THEY DID, you just told us that your boat survived three days of 50-foot waves (it didn’t) and 100-mph winds (also no) and you think the sharks can top that? Even a pod of half a dozen orca can only muster about a 3-foot wave, and they’re about five times the size of tiger sharks.
  • Sharks can’t hear you breathing.
  • Sharks can’t smell you through a fucking boat, you fucking shitweasel.

I feel like I’m taking crazy pills.

Conclusion

Here’s what we know: Two women left Hawaii on a boat on May 3. Five months later, they were picked up 900 miles south of Japan.

They claim to have been hammered by multiple hurricane-force storms. That absolutely didn’t happen.

They claim to have been attacked by sharks. That absolutely didn’t happen.

They claim that their boat was rendered immobile. It absolutely wasn’t.

They claim that they packed a year’s worth of food, but that they somehow went through 90% of it.

They claim that all of their communications devices failed.

They admit to not turning on a distress beacon.

So what happened? Here’s my guess. Two women bought a shitload of food and put in on a boat, then sailed it a hundred miles off the coast of Hawaii and turned the motor off. They mussed up the sail a little bit (or just suck at stowing it in the first place), and just sat there, waiting for the trade winds and Equatorial Current to take them west, content in the knowledge that the boat wouldn’t sink and they wouldn’t run out of food until they reached Japan, if it came to that. When they finally made contact with a boat, they invented the sharks, the storms, the technical failures, the hardships, etc. They’re expecting publicity (mission accomplished) and maybe a book deal. Maybe a TV special. Maybe an episode of “I Shouldn’t Be Alive.” Hell, maybe a movie. They’re attention whores.

Luckily, I’m not the only person noticing the problems here. Multiple outlets are reporting that they never turned on their EPIRB. More are reporting inconsistencies with weather and timing. Their story is falling apart only days after it landed, partly because they can’t even keep it straight themselves. You’d think with five months of nothing to do, they could have at least invented a better narrative, but I guess not. They’re on their way to being exposed, as I hope they are. Fuck ’em.

Bonus tidbits

I’ve been obsessing over this story for days, and I keep turning up more shit. It’s an endless treasure trove of lies. Here’s a few I decided to leave out.

  • Appel claims that they couldn’t turn back to Hawaii after the first (made-up) storm because there were no harbors deep enough for a boat the size of theirs. Ignoring the fact that they had just left Hawaii, the islands are also home to several enormous marinas, a Coast Guard base, and PEARL FUCKING HARBOR. If it can hold the Navy, it can hold your 50-footer.
  • They say that their tech was all broken before May 30, which is why they didn’t see the storm coming, but then they say they sent out distress calls for five months. On what?
  • They say a “white squall” flooded the engine. A white squall is a sudden burst of wind out at sea that whips up the waves and makes whitecaps. It is not accompanied by rain. That’s called a black squall, named for the dark clouds that come with it. Anyone with the experience Appel claims to have should know better.
  • She says the squall “dropped copious amounts of water and it flooded the cockpit, which actually ended up flooding the ignition and the starter for the boat.” Believe it or not, the cockpit does not actually drain directly into vital engine components, in the same way that the gutters on your roof do not drain on to your home theater. Also, boat ignition systems are waterproof since, you know, they’re on boats.
  • The engine is below decks. It is not open to the outdoors. If there’s enough water in the engine bay to disable it, the boat is probably well on its way to sinking.
  • Appel says “we got pushed into what’s called the Devil’s Triangle, where boats go in, but they very rarely come out. And if they do, there are no people on them.” Firstly, the Devil’s Triangle is another name for the Bermuda Triangle, which is in a different ocean. Secondly, the legends of the Bermuda Triangle are completely unsubstantiated, like alien abductions or Bigfoot sightings. It’s possible that she was referring to the Devil’s Sea or Dragon’s Triangle, different names for a similarly myth-shrouded area of the Pacific. Except they weren’t in that part of the ocean. And besides, there is no magic area of the Pacific with skeleton-filled ships floating in limbo forever.
  • Appel says she took two years planning this trip. It doesn’t take two years to plan one month on a boat. You fill up the fuel tank, take one day to go to the grocery store, check all the vital systems (like maybe your SIX FUCKING RADIOS), and head out. One week of prep, as long as the boat doesn’t need major maintenance.
  • Appel describes telling Fuiava about the trip as follows: “When I asked Natasha, I told her I have no idea what’s going to happen out there and she said, ‘That’s OK, I’ve never sailed.’” That is super not ok. One person cannot operate a 50-foot boat for three hours without help, let alone three weeks. Two people are already stretched thin, given that someone has to be awake 24/7 to keep watch, and that’s if they both know what they’re doing. I wouldn’t dare do this trip with two people. No experienced sailor would set off on a trip like this with a useless copilot they’d just met, and no sane human being would agree to a three-week boat trip with a stranger who says they have no idea what to expect.
2d4f644844e2c97477931ff9adf261eff3f234165981800e03d0fcbcaa709d93
  • Also, why didn’t you have any idea what was going to happen out there?! I’ve personally sailed a very similar voyage from the Galapagos to French Polynesia. It took 23 days, at the same time of year, in the same trade winds and currents, and I’ll tell you what happens out there. NOTHING. It is boring as shit. The winds don’t change. The temperature is balmy. The sea stretches in every direction. You adjust the sails once a week. You watch for big ships (there aren’t any). You catch some fish. You read a lot of books. One of the most exciting moments is when the ETA on your GPS blinks over from –:– to 99:59, and then you still have four days left. It is an exceedingly uneventful way to pass the time.
  • They claim that they were able to get their crippled boat, without sails, to cover the 1000 miles to Christmas Island, part of the island nation of Kiribati, but didn’t try to land because “It is uninhabited. They only have habitation on the northwest corner and their reef was too shallow for us to cross in order to get into the lagoon.” Christmas Island is home to 2,000 people and regularly hosts much larger ships.
trip-to-kiritimati-1
It has a fucking airport… [EDIT: I should clarify that this is a generic visual aid for airport, not the actual Kiribati airport]
  • When asked if the small island would have been a good place to land and repair their sails, Appel said no. “Kiribati, um, one whole half of the island is called shipwreck beach for a reason.” It’s not. It’s called Bay of Wrecks, it’s a small area on the east side, and the REST OF THE ISLAND is fine.
  • Instead of stopping in Kiribati, they decided they “could make it to the next spot,” which, in their mind, was the Cook Islands. The Cook Islands are 1600 miles from Kiribati, too far to go by motor alone even if the motor hadn’t failed, and past the original destination of Tahiti. That, apparently, was a better option than just going to the OTHER FUCKING SIDE of Kiribati, if they were even at Kiribati, which I doubt.
  • The Coast Guard made radio contact with a vessel that identified itself as the Sea Nymph near Tahiti in June, well after the alleged boat-crippling storms, and the captain said they were not in distress and expected to make land the next morning. Either it was a different Sea Nymph (plausible) or they somehow managed to fuck that up and ended up 5,000 miles west of there instead.

More Bonus Tidbits (as of 11/1)

It’s only been 24 hours since I posted this and more shit keeps coming up.

  • They have doubled down on their claim that they encountered 30-foot waves and hurricane-force winds on the night they left, despite no evidence that any such storm existed. Even very generously assuming that they mean 30-foot swell — caused by large scale wind and weather — and not 30-foot waves — caused by the storm you’re in right at that moment — doesn’t account for the lack of evidence of the wind.
  • “We got into a Force 11 storm, and it lasted for two nights and three days,” Appel said Tuesday.” No, you didn’t. Any storm that strong and that long would have showed up on radar, which is live 24 hours a day and updated every three hours. The storm didn’t exist. This is as clear-cut a lie as there could be. It’s like lying about what time it is.
  • Appel’s mother told the AP that she called the Coast Guard to report Jennifer missing about a week and a half into their trip. Not only is that too early to report someone missing if they’re supposed to be on a 3-week trip, but the Coast Guard say they never got such a call. They received a call from a “family friend” they identified as a male on May 19, still several days before the women expected to arrive.
  • The women said they filed a float plan listing their course and other details with some friends and relatives. In an interview with the Coast Guard, the women said they had filed no float plan. You don’t have to file a float plan. It’s not like a flight plan. But in general, it’s a good idea to tell people, “if you don’t hear from me in a month, tell the Coast Guard.”
tumblr_lud0n1uJ2I1qmkbfvo1_500
  • MORE MAGIC SHARK MADNESS. Apparently they claim the tiger sharks were 20-30 feet long. They don’t get that big. Also, according to CBS, “University of Hawaii professor and veteran shark researcher Kim Holland has never heard of any kind of shark repeatedly attacking a boat hull throughout a night. He also said tiger sharks never jump out of the water and do not make coordinated attacks.”
  • They’re now saying that they contacted someone on Wake Island, after previously saying that they weren’t ever able to contact anyone. They didn’t land on Wake Island, though, because they weren’t able to navigate the two-ish miles to the other side of the island to land. So no one could come out and tow them in? No one on Wake Island reported an adrift vessel? Wake Island has about 100 members of the Air Force on it at any given time and a substantial airstrip, there’s no reason a rescue couldn’t have been mounted from there.
  • They’ve changed their story about the fishing vessel that originally contacted them. Originally they said they were kind, but now report that they feared for their safety. They claim that the fishing boat damaged their boat, and then Appel said, “I also believe that they knew they were damaging the boat. And if we couldn’t get additional help, that boat would sink, and they would get … two girls to do whatever they wanted to.”
  • In one account, they said that Fuiava had to swim to the fishing boat to tell them to stop damaging the boat while towing it. Not only is it ludicrously impossible that a swimming person could catch a boat in motion, but it’s also not especially plausible that towing a boat would cause it damage. And if it were, they could have just cut the rope and TURNED ON THEIR FUCKING BEACON.
  • The captain of the fishing vessel says he saw someone waving a flag on a boat about a mile from him. When he went over, they asked to use his sat phone, and for him to tow them to Midway Island, which is almost 2000 miles from where they were. He towed them overnight, at which point they asked to be turned loose and called the Navy instead. He also says he offered them water and food, which they declined.
  • Mike Michelwait, owner of the Honolulu Sailing Company, says he’s made the trip from Hawaii to Tahiti several times, but wouldn’t try it with only two people. “There’s only two of them on board, and it’s a 50-foot boat,” he said. “That’s a lot of boat to handle.”

Even More Bonus Tidbits (as of 11/2)

I can’t help myself.

  • Fuiava claims to have lost 70 pounds during the trip, despite having a year’s worth of food, despite almost running out of food in five months. And if that clusterfuck wasn’t enough, her clothes still fit fine.
  • That line of green shit on the boat is majorly suspicious.
    Capture

    Normally, you’re supposed to clean your bottom paint every 2-4 months, depending on where your boat is (green scum grows faster in warm water). You’re also supposed to paint the boat’s waterline (the barrier between white and blue, in this case) roughly where the water sits when the boat is in the water. You can see in the screenshot that that’s the case. The blue is relatively clean because it’s what’s called “bottom paint,” which is engineered to repel algae/barnacle/mussel growth. The white isn’t supposed to be underwater at all. But the green stuff only grows under prolonged submersion, so what’s it doing so high on the white?


    Glad you asked. Green scum up that high on the boat indicates that the boat was sitting much lower in the water than it was when they got picked up, and for a long time. For perspective, this couple writes about getting rid of 1200 pounds of stuff and rising two inches in the water, and that’s on a (relatively very light) 5-ton catamaran. Shedding weight will have more impact the lighter the boat is. A 50-foot sloop like the Sea Nymph probably weighs more like 20 tons, and that’s before the 5-6 tons of extra fiberglass and keel that Appel claims to have added on. All the food and water they went through in five months can’t come close to accounting for what looks like two feet of waterline difference. That boat looks to have been seriously weighed down for a very long time.

I don’t know what the fuck happened. But I do know these women are full of shit.

353 responses

  1. Good analysis Mr Onion. I agree with most. But, a couple points:
    1. Growth high up on topsides could only come from being heeled over. Would not have growth that high if they were drifting. Growth was on both sides. Seems to indicate they were able to sail on both tacks and did sail quite a long time to get that much growth.
    2. Pictures show solar panel and wind generator. Power Survivor 40E draws 4 amps so could certainly be run from those. Although it appears those would be the only things on the boat that were working.
    3. Appel said they were putting out Pahns (sic) every day, but also said she thought it had a range of 200nm. First thing you learn about VHFs is they are line of sight. Maximum range depends on height of antennas but generally 30 – 40nm at most, and that is with at least one very tall antenna.
    4. I disagree with the general statement that you can’t handle a 50ft boat (it was actually 45ft) with only two people. It certainly can and has be done. Most people cruising are couples and they do these passages all the time. Yes, it helps if they know WTF they’re doing but to generalize and say it can’t or shouldn’t be done is wrong.
    5. Says they got to within a mile or two of Wake Island and made contact with someone. Reported being in distress and was told if they could get to the harbor entrance they could get towed in. They couldn’t sail to the other side of the island. And nobody reported a vessel in distress? Haven’t seem any record of this call being received.
    6. The engine in this boat is in the bilge. Starter could easily be flooded with water ingress.
    7. Ignition switch could also fail if cockpit is flooded. Engine control panels are not made for submersion.
    8. Broken spreader – I believe she said bolt holding spreader to mast bracket was broken. Also said she climbed the mast to fix it. Well, was it fixed or not? Looks to be attached to mast in rescue pics.
    9. Being towed by a fishing boat could certainly cause damage, especially in any kind of sea. Happened to a boat of mine when the rudder stock broke. Violent yawing ripped pulpit off. Although that doesn’t appear to have happened here. And, as stated, they could have cast off or cut tow line.
    10. Why did the Navy declare the boat unseaworthy? And if it was shouldn’t they have scuttled it?

    1. I dunno- the growth on the freeboard looks more to me like waves lapping up the sides as a result of drifting (where boats get blown sideways) more than from heeling

    2. French, basic english and never ever sailed in my life but I loved this whole post.
      You made my day

  2. I loved all the references – “shitweasel” being my fave!

    1. I know, right? I’m so stealing that word.

    1. Are you suggesting that a 15-foot tiger shark can sink a 50-foot boat because an 85-foot sperm whale did the same to the Essex almost 200 years ago?

      1. No.

      2. Are you suggesting that a 15-foot tiger shark can sink a 50-foot boat…? What dies that remind me of…

        “Are you suggesting coconuts migrate?

        Not at all, they could be carried.

        What — a swallow carrying a coconut?

        It could grip it by the husk!

        It’s not a question of where he grips it! It’s a simple
        question of weight ratios! A five ounce bird could not carry a 1 pound
        coconut.

        Well, it doesn’t matter. Will you go and tell your master
        that Arthur from the Court of Camelot is here.

        Listen, in order to maintain air-speed velocity, a swallow
        needs to beat its wings 43 times every second, right?

        Please!

        Am I right?

        I’m not interested!

        It could be carried by an African swallow!

        Oh, yeah, an African swallow maybe, but not a European
        swallow, that’s my point.

        Oh, yeah, I agree with that…”

  3. How about running a check on ole’ Jennifer Appel – surprisingly she is a wanna be actor – and is a ‘stunt woman’ no less, let me take a guess, she is going to sell her story, and play the lead.

    1. Brilliant! Good catch!

  4. You forgot about the huge dolphin party they had where 70 dolphins showed up at night to celebrate their rescue from the 20-30ft tiger sharks.

  5. […] I’m no sea dog, but Jennifer Appel and Tasha Fuiava’s tale of survival on the high seas didn’t ring true to me…I’m no sea dog, but this writer guy is and he reckons the two women who claimed to have been drifting at sea for five months, who claimed to have had no way of communicating with the outside world, were lashed by violent storms and encountered thrashing sharks, yet managed to come out of it looking pretty peachy, are fully of it… A Colorado-based blogger/sailor picks some gaping holes in their story, offering nineteen reasons, in great detail, explaining why this survival story sounds fishy. […]

  6. I’m not a sailor by any means but I have gone out with a very experienced mariner neighbor on his sailboat on many occasions. Every passenger, no matter how green, was fully drilled on how to use emergency equipment and what to do should disaster sttrike. Anyone unwilling or unable to commit to this would not be allowed aboard. That being said, we always monitored channel 16 on the VHF radio to render assistance if another vessel was in trouble. Likewise, I was instructed to send a distress call on that channel in an emergency and my neighbor was incapacitated.

    The story I have heard is that the two tried to radio passing ships and fired off flares only to be ignored. I find that very hard to believe. Unless every ship they hailed was crewed by people more incompetent than themselves or doing something illegal, their calls and flares should have elicited a response by someone. My neighbor taught me many unwritten “codes” that sailors follow no matter their nationality. As soon as a distress call is heard, you do what you can render assistance. If you are able to reach the other craft, you stop whatever you are doing and get there as quickly and safely as possible. Those unable to assist could help relay radio calls, contact others that can assist, coordinate rescue until an agency such as the US Coast Guard takes over, or be on standby to assist. Their story that that many ships ignored a vessel in distress adds another notch to the bullshit meter.

  7. This is a brilliant deconstruction of this event. The author’s bona-fides both as a sailor and an investigator are undeniable. As a sailor myself with over 40 years and 25,000 miles of experience, I will vouch for virtually every opinion and piece of analysis he has made of this strange voyage. (My only quibble is very minor – I disagree with his point about the sail cover not being on. I believe sail covers should never be on the sails while a boat is underway – even if by power. Sails should always be ready to be hoisted, in case of engine failure – if for no other reason. But that point is very secondary.)
    Where I do differ with the author is in his conclusion that this sad affair must have been concocted from the get-go as some sort of misguided publicity stunt. While I love sailing, love being at sea, I have finally after a great variety of experiences on the big lakes and oceans of the world come to the conclusion that man was not designed to go to sea. Sailing makes people do very crazy things. I call it the Captain Bligh syndrome. Captain Bligh turned himself into a nutbar on his long voyage to Tahiti – acting so crazily that his crew, led by Fletcher Christian, did something even crazier – mutinying, sailing the ship all the way to Pitcairn Island, then burning it.
    I have sailed with many racing skippers who turn into little Captain Blighs even on short evening races around the cans. Best story I know of this sort of thing was from President Kennedy, who once (as a young man) was so exasperated with his martinet skipper on a race off Cape Cod that he jumped overboard and swam for shore. Crazy actions from the skipper; crazy action from Kennedy.
    There are lots of stories from the sea that are crazier than the one of these two women. One of the best known is the story of Donald Crowhurst, who mysteriously sailed around in circles in the South Atlantic, while filing fake positions that he was sailing around the world, to the organizers of the Singlehanded Nonstop Round the World race he was sailing in. (For more information on that wild yarn you can see my film “Horse Latitudes”, which is coincidently being re-released (to YouTube) by Telefilm Canada, next week – November 7th). Crowhurst no more planned his tragic voyage than I think these ladies did. They all just went a bit nuts out there. Another film of mine, “Lost!” based on the book by Thomas Thompson, chronicles a story of craziness at sea (this time religiously based) that makes the stories of Crowhurst and of these ladies pale by comparison.
    The author suggests that the vast amount of food the women took with them is an indicator that they planned the ruse. But I have seen even crazier provisioning. While working as a charter skipper in the Bahamas, I was anchored in a remote cove on Rose Island not far from Nassau, when a catamaran came sailing into the cove and managed to crash into the only patch of exposed coral head in the bay, puncturing one of the two amas. I motored across the boat in the Zodiac to see if I could help, and found them…blithely making popcorn. They told me they had been planning the trip for two years (just like the two Hawaiian women). They had provisioned the boat with nothing but hundreds of pounds of popcorn, planned to sail around the world on the crappy home-built cat, and had two days earlier finally got up the nerve to leave Florida on their big trip. Their boat was now stuck on a reef, with half of it rapidly filling up with water. Could I do anything to help, I asked. Their only request was that I tie them off to a palm tree onshore – telling, but a completely useless thing to do, since they were well and truly stuck on the coral. That was their only concern. They offered me some popcorn, showed me the AK-47 that they had in case they were boarded “by pirates”, and that was that.
    People love the romantic idea idea of going to sea, but many cannot handle the reality of it. I was once in Cape May, New Jersey when after a stormy night on the ocean a big boat in the 50 foot range – perhaps similar to what these women had – limped into harbour. There was two of them – a man and his wife. She got off the boat, hailed a cab, and left him. The story unfolded – she had faithfully built and provisioned the boat for their big adventure for years. Then they went sailing – they had been out for three days. She got so scared; he acted so badly, that she left, presumably never to go to sea again,certainly not with him.
    People get crazy out there. That’s probably what happened to these women. They had some bad experiences out there. They probably were in a storm. Maybe they did see a shark or two. Everyone exaggerates the speed of the wind, the size of the waves, the length of sharks.They started making bad decisions out there, One thing led to another. Finally, like Donald Crowhurst, they had created such a cockamamie bunch of lies that they couldn’t escape it. Hey, if it can happen to the President of the US, you can bet it can happen to a couple of sailors on the big blue sea.
    One last story, to try to prove my point. I once sailed out of Norfolk, Virginia, heading for New York. The weather forecast wasn’t great. In fact, there were tornado warnings (maybe it was “watches”). However, the US Weather Service gives out severe weather watches based on counties – and what the hell sailor knows where the counties are? They certainly are not shown on any marine chart – nor even on most regular maps or GPS units. I somehow got the feeling that wherever these counties were, they weren’t too close. And I was probably right – we didn’t have any tornadoes (they very seldom last on the ocean, of course). However we did have a weird night at sea, with a big electrical storm that caused the boat to be enmeshed in St. Elmo’s Fire – a spooky sparking of all the rigging, lifelines and wiring Then I lost my navigation system – Loran. (This was a few years ago, as you can tell). I thought it was because of the St. Elmo’s Fire – turned out it was because I had sailed out of the Southern Loran chain and into the Northern – and because I too was getting sea-crazy, I didn’t figure that out, and didn’t figure out how to re-program the device. Then – right in the middle of the heavy sea traffic lanes – thick fog came in, and the wind died. And then, worst of all, the engine overheating light came on and steam started pouring out of the engine room. The water pump was broken. So – no engine, no wind, thick fog, in the middle of the shipping lanes off the heavily travelled Delaware Atlantic coast. So what did I do? Well, eventually called a towing service. Except that I had no Loran in order to tell him where we were. And he tried, but certainly couldn’t find me in the thick fog. Eventually, just like these two women, we made it back to shore. And only once out of the grip of sea-craziness, once back on dry land, did I realize I wasn’t in trouble at all out there. The engine still worked. It just needed to have coolant poured into it. And I was surrrounded by trillions of gallons of cold Atlantic water! All we needed to do was to use a bucket to keep the heat exchanger full of water. Might have been a bit of a wet and messy job, but who cares? We would have made our own way back to shore.
    I was sea-crazy and didn’t think of that simple solution, just like these two women didn’t think of rational solutions to their problems Fortunately my little incident was over in days, whereas theirs took months. So should we slag and defame them for their sorry misadventure? I don’t think so. Weird crap at sea happens to the best of us. Let them be. Whatever happened, I’m sure it wasn’t fun for them. So if they can get themselves a book or a movie deal out of it, whether truth or fiction, more power to them.

    1. Your comment “sailing makes people do crazy things” reminded me of this gentleman: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/this-britain/sailor-using-road-map-to-navigate-is-rescued-710914.html
      Most people would take the hint that they needed to learn more about what they were doing after the first rescue; you’d think everyone would after the third, but no. It could be that these ladies are of the same species.

    2. I’m not a sailor, I was raised in Hawaii tho, so I’m going to comment. These two were bat shite crazy from the get go.

    3. Since Appel had written books previously, they’d probably been at sea for a week—bored to tears—and started writing.

      Last week, I emailed a friend that the two “sailors” called for rescue because they’d run out of ink!

  8. They should pay the navy for actions

    1. they did pay for the Navy and USCG actions through their lifelong tax payments. That’s our deal in America. It’s not perfect, but it seems to work good enough.

      1. However falsely reporting distress can be criminal and can be ‘billed’ to the person making the false report. Same as the morons who climb mountains w/o appropriate gear then need rescuing.

  9. PAUL F REDDING, Jr Avatar
    PAUL F REDDING, Jr

    I love this story and your annihilation of their nonsense.
    Can you address the implausibilty of the 2 year prep which involved reinforcing the boat with 6 tons of fiberglass?!!?

    1. The idea of the fiberglass is absurd. For starters, why? One might go through a couple of gallons, maybe even 10 or 20 doing structural repairs, but 20 gallons is like 100 -120 pounds. To get to 6 tons you would need something like 1000 gallons taking into account the weight of the glass cloth. So at $50 minimum a gallon, you’re looking at $50,000, plus the cloth. If you had that money, you could buy a nice boat you wouldn’t need to do any work on… And where would they put all that epoxy and fiberglass? Cured epoxy has the same volume as liquid epoxy. 45′ is a big boat, but imagine loading 1000 gallon milk jugs on it…. No room for the food.

  10. Great read, very entertaining.
    These two are so lucky that while going through force 11 winds the surfboard and the rest of the crap on deck did not fly away!
    BTW, that high scumline needs investigating… Hahaha.

  11. No way anybody with no sailing experience would allow herself to be out there adrift going through storms, etc. without that beacon being used. They’d have come to blows over that before the first storm had ended. And any sane sailor would have turned around at the first sign of trouble knowing the other person was totally inexperienced so wouldn’t be of much help and would be prone to panic and making bad choices under stress.

  12. […] A fine-toothed comb is passed through that “five months stranded in a sailboat” story from the other day in a delightfully expert fashion here. […]

  13. Look at the shape of the green scum line. I don’t think it has been sitting low in the water, or even just heeled over on long tacks for a long time. That boat has been sitting on a mudflat/estuary somewhere, heeling over on its keel every low tide. Can’t be too many locations like that in the central Pacific…?

    1. It is almost certainly not from stationary. The swell upwards amidship, back down toward ends, then up abruptly at bow and stern shows the effect of bow and stern waves.

  14. On the subject of that dark green “scummy looking” stuff on the side of the boat. I’d be fun to look at the other side of that boat. If that other side is clean and this is really “a boat sitting in stagnant water” scum. It means the boat was in stagnant water on its side for awhile. Either on a beach at a marina or in the hold of a bigger boat. Then the question arises “what would be the point of having a 50 ft boat do nothing for a long time, then show up somewhere far away in SE Asia, and have a need to obscure what it had been doing?”

  15. I agree. These women are hiding a lot.
    They look so healthy and nourished. And
    Much too ‘touchy feely for my taste. Appel
    Seems like a drama queen and her girlfriend looks
    Like tiger woods. Did they bring 10 months of tampons?

    1. And two big dogs, it’s all looking a bit Parisien! Eeww!

  16. You don’t have to file a float plan. It’s not like a flight plan. But in general, it’s a good idea to tell people, “if you don’t hear from me in a month, tell the Coast Guard.”

    You dont have to file a flight plan either (if you are flying VFR). But similarly, smart to do.

    1. oh, love the breakdown though – thanks. I remember thinking “what a load of crap” when they launched into their shark story

  17. When I first read their story I was suspicious, I’ve been sailing since I was 10 years old and done thousands of miles and ocean races. It just didn’t add up the first thing I thought was where was their EPIRB and wouldn’t they have a satphone not to mention what use is a cell phone if out of range other than possibly used for a navigation app.

    Great deconstruction you’ve hit the nail on the head and while these 2 have obviously got media attention it looks like it’ll all go horribly wrong for them as they simply can’t agree a plausible story.

    I really hope that once it’s proven that these two cockwombles have lied that the US Coastguard hits them with full costs of rescue and whatever else they could be charged with by law enforcement.

    I certainly hope they get no book or tv deals on the back of it which it sounds like was the intention.

  18. […] now there’s a detailed breakdown of all the fishy stuff in their story. They had an emergency beacon that they didn’t even bother to turn […]

  19. Also notice that the blonde woman’s hair has been colored within about four weeks. Maybe she rushed off to a hair salon before this picture was taken. Highest priority after an Essex-like sea voyage.

  20. Also note that the blond woman has dark roots that would appear in about four weeks. It’s hard to make the math make sense. She got her hair bleached two months before being rescued after five months at sea? Or immediately after being rescued, she had her hair bleached but left the roots?

  21. I guess most people in the world live off rice and dogs have no trouble digesting carbs. My dog is on a vegan diet for seven years and one of the oldest dogs in the world was fed a vegan diet (Bramble, 27), eating a lot of carbs. They are not carnivores but omnivores who eat literally any shit

  22. Margaret Miasnikova Avatar
    Margaret Miasnikova

    I don’t know about everything else, but the first part about food and that you can not live on carbs etc… You are wrong, believe me. My grandparents survived a Famine-Genocide in Ukraine, in 1932-1933, they ate almost nothing, mostly potato for 2 years. My other grandmother survived the Siege of Leningrad, same there, 2 years. Yes, a lot of people died, but there were survivors, and the conditions were even worse. The only thing I agree with is that if you survived you look a bit different to say the least..

  23. I’m waiting patiently for the “Every boat that could have helped us was manned by men, therefore they were sexist” storyline. They’ve already tiptoed up to it with the fishing vessel making them feel “uncomfortable”. That’s the sort of narrative that sells nowadays.

  24. I am the most important human being to have inhaled oxygen and in all humility I know for a fact that this vessel was laden with either drugs or weapons or both.

  25. Reblogged this on Geeking Out about It and commented:
    Wow!

  26. My thoughts exactly

  27. I love love love these 19 facts. I know nothing about sailing. But love this persons intelligence writing the facts than the story itself.

  28. This entire thing reads like one long episode of two people’s bipolar mania coming together.

    1. I was about to say they had at some point gone mad https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gsRNcxy0QhQ but you sya it better.

  29. Very interesting! However, this account was ruined by all the juvenile use of profanity, which is best defined as: “The sign of a weak mind feebly trying to express itself”.

    1. I’m sorry to hear that, Allan. If you’re bothered by profanity, you’re welcome to go fuck yourself.

      1. Allan is, perhaps unsurprisingly, (mis)quoting a Christian author from 100 years ago. He might not be caught up on the latest research.

    2. Recent research into the use of profane language and what it tells us about the mind of the user actually contradicts your quote, Allan.

      1. Also, swearing is fun.

      2. He had to do it to prove he was a sailor?

    3. You enhanced your disproved statement by being a pious little prick Allan. If a little expressive profanity offends you, you need to get a fucking life or avoid sailors!

    4. Lobster Thermadwarf Avatar
      Lobster Thermadwarf

      Yes, yes this was indeed once a pithy remark about profanity, but it was before we had fucking shitweasels, now wasn’t it?

    5. You gotta be fucking kidding me? If profanity is so mother fucking juvenile then why aren’t kids allowed to use it?

  30. Hah! Great reply !

  31. Weed run. Boat was taken to one of Islands mentioned stashed away after cargo of tons of Marijuana off loaded hid and returned to sea in plot to avert facts.Could have went to Japan and then went to destination where they were rescued.

  32. Geoff Cunningham Avatar
    Geoff Cunningham

    Agree mostly with what’s been said here. I’m a novice sailor and I have owned Ericson 27 and a Ganley steal sailing vessel when I lived in NZ.

    So why say ‘they? Shouldn’t it be Jennifer Appel(skipper)? Fuiava I believe had never sailed before so her account is even more worthless then the skippers. Look, everything Jennifer says is an outrageous lie nobody can be that stupid. But her friend can and was easily fooled, sorry dear all six Communication devices don’t work. Oh the satellite phone? ‘yeah that’s broken too. Fuiava may well have asked ‘what’s that funny cylinder thing with the antenna on top? Oh that’s not what you may think it is, nope that’s my vibrator honey, I’ll show you how to use it later.

    Jennifer stocked up one years worth of food because she planned to be at sea for a very long time. One days sail from Tahiti they go off course but radios the Coast Guard that they would be landing in Tahiti the next day. I believe the skipper deliberately took the boat off course and under sail power and in fact Navigating to a set plan. Avoiding any human contact or islands. If they had no sailing power then they’d be side on to the waves for five months I can’t believe they could survive living like that.

    So whats the motivation or reason the skipper diverted the boat for five months when at anytime the skipper could have initiated the emergency beacon? Hope you’re not drinking coffee as you might want to put it aside for now. One word.

    Lust.

    That’s right Jennifer was fearful that Fuiava may fly back to Hawaii once they reach Tahiti. So she basically kidnapped Fuiava whom I believe wanted off the boat which could explain the strange behavior of Jennifer. The question I have is Fuiava suffering from Stockholm syndrome?

    1. Geoff Cunningham Avatar

      My hope in posting this is Fuiava is interviewed separately from Jennifer by a clinical Psychologist

  33. Personally, I think Jen manipulated the situation in order to keep the other woman prisoner… unbeknownst to her.

  34. Are you you serios? How is it not crystal clear what happened?
    I’ve read the news – but now seeing this photo tell the whole story – i have zero sailoring background, but i’ve seen beached boats.
    This boat was beached for four months in stagnant water. This dark seaweed growth is on the side that it was tilted to.
    Thd chicks had themselves a honeymoon on some deserted beach, the dogs had the time of their lives in the wild.
    And then they pushed off and decided to score some publicity as well.

    1. I don’t like to speculate about what they might have done, I’m just pointing out that they didn’t do what they say they did.

    2. Geoff Cunningham Avatar
      Geoff Cunningham

      As been pointed out that suggests under power sailing

      “This dark seaweed growth is on the side that it was tilted to.”

      Skipper is a predator of much younger woman

      1. The voyage of the S.S. Kevin Spacey.

  35. Good thing they didn’t encounter Cthulhu or run into an iceberg – both equally likely.

  36. As the assistant curator of a public aquarium (and a marine biologist/educator of over 17 years) the stories they have spun about their animal encounters are… CRAP. None of it makes any sense, the behavior is all wrong.
    The time of day they “attack” is incorrect, sharks (in general) are most active at dusk and dawn. And, as you pointed out, this is a predominately coastal species.
    Pack or schooling mentality is not a marker for this species, they can feed in the same areas but only when multiple individuals are attracted to the same area and then compete.
    Tiger sharks do give live birth but mom loses her appetite leading up to parturition and if the pup is still around when it returns? It is dinner. Hell, the pups of Tiger sharks eat each other in utero until there is only one left (intrauterine cannabalism).
    Ramming the boat, ok…maybe. But, over and over again? Sharks are hardy creatures but a few bumps out of curiousity (of a large object floating at the surface that could be a potential carcass) is a far cry from this cognitive attack formation these nitwits claim took place, especially a violent one that could have caused animal pain or bodily harm.
    There is so, so much more and it was really neat to hear them debunked from a nautical perspective. From a biological perspective, this is a fairy tale.

    1. Um, tiger sharks give birth too litters of more than one…

  37. If you don’t believe their story, you’re sexist.

  38. […] National Review‘s Kevin Williamson on why bureaucracies are bad at stopping terrorism. A compelling analysis on why those two recently rescued sailors are probably full of […]

  39. RE: The sharks.

    Maybe they encountered juvenile megalodons. 🙂

  40. […] National Review‘s Kevin Williamson on why bureaucracies are bad at stopping terrorism. A compelling analysis on why those two recently rescued sailors are probably full of […]

  41. Most of the statements in the article are spot on, though the part about the food is nonsense. Oatmeal is 12% protein and contains all nine essential amino acids. While trying to survive long term on oatmeal would be difficult, it wouldn’t cause protein deficiency, and that also ignores the fact that most oatmeal these days is fortified with extra vitamins and minerals. It’s not a superfood, but it would take way longer than five months to start developing problems due to a protein deficiency.

  42. […] National Review‘s Kevin Williamson on why bureaucracies are bad at stopping terrorism. A compelling analysis on why those two recently rescued sailors are probably full of […]

  43. Interesting read.
    That said, the author should probably provide some citations in the “Food” section or present some credentials as a MD or nutritionist. The assertions there seem pretty thin and casually invoking flimy amino acid science and nazi experiments(cool?) doesn’t really help. I’m no expert, but I know that rice, pasta and oatmeal are not only composed of only carbohydrates. Look it up! They have protein and amino acids for sure.
    I sincerely enjoyed the rest of the technical, sailing parts of the post though.

  44. I think Appel said in one interview that the boat was a recovered wreck which could explain the green growth, maybe boat was stranded somewhere for a long time? Just surprising that if she spent 2 yrs refurbishing the boat up in Hawaii, like she claims, that she never cleaned up the hull? Another question not yet seen in media is that did they hv any other passengers with them? Seems very unplausible that these darwinists would hv survived so many thousand miles in so good shape as pointed out. Also surprising Navy is not releasing any more pics of boat condition after being declared unseaworthy, in today’s world I would think they would cover their bases with sufficient evidence should they decide to sue gov’t for the loss of their boat in the aftermath. Why was the boat set adrift and not scuttled? This is a real sailors tale, bound to keep many persons interests peaked until the truth comes out or it is forgotten in the mists of time…

  45. I disagree about the boat being loaded down.

    First, the scum line must go 18 inches to two feet up the hull. This boat has been tentatively identified as a Starratt-Jenks 45, with a displacement 29,500 lbs. This boat has a pounds/inch immersion value of 1,277. Even if we assume the scum line is only 12 inches, that would be a load of over 15,000 lbs.

    Second – if the growth was from a static load the scum line would be horizontal, as is the waterline. Looks like I can’t post pics but look here
    from this web page . The scum line almost matches the wave train of a boat sailing at moderate speed.

    I maintain that they were sailing heeled over. I am very familiar with this boat as a friend used to own one and I sailed on it regularly. It is a very tender boat (11ft beam) that would put its rail in the water with little effort. I can see this kind of growth if sailing for 5 months.

    “I don’t know what the fuck happened. But I do know these women are full of shit.” agree 100%

    1. Links did not post. Sorry. Hopefully it makes sense without.

    2. Although I’d like to see the opposite side, I agree about the scum line. I looked up “ghost ships”, and one story had photos of a similar scum line—where the skipper had died, and the sloop sailed for months.

  46. Geoff Cunningham Avatar
    Geoff Cunningham

    Blue Dave, thanks been thinking along the same lines. I have a question since the boat was approximately 5800 nautical miles from its last radio contact with US Coast Guard. Given they were under sail power and sailing at least five knots, even with navigation(minor) errors they’d have been near Japan almost certainly within two months. So where the hell were they for the other 3 months? Both looked to be in fantastic condition to have been on that boat for almost six months. I’d say they honeymooned on a remote island along the way for those 3 months.

  47. You are getting it all wrong. They were not talking about tiger sharks. But about sharks and the tiger that was in their boat. Damn tiger could smell and listen them.
    Just like in that book /movie

Leave a reply to rahsaanabdul Cancel reply