Have you missed me? Trick question; I know you’ve missed me. Frankly, the main reason I haven’t been writing is laziness. I make no bones about it. The second reason is that I got hit by a car in April and broke four bones in my hand, and the third is that I had a very outdoorsy summer (after my hand healed), and the fourth is that I have a girlfriend to occupy my free time now, and the fifth is that the world has gone insane.

I mean, what am I even supposed to write about? What am I supposed to say? How am I supposed to point to one stupid thing to focus on — like the fact that Solar Roadways’ website suddenly doesn’t work because haha fuck them — when the real-life things that are happening are so much stupider? The world is an Onion headline and I can’t even pick a place to start.

So let’s start with some morons in a boat!

No politics here (though I’m sure if you squint you can find a way to accuse me of racism or sexism or something), just me and my lifetime of sailing experience, including nearly five years living on a boat, against these two idiots.

Those two are named Jennifer Appel and Tasha Fuiava, and their story has been everywhere recently. Here’s their account of what happened, in brief:

They set off from Hawaii in May of this year, bound for Tahiti. They were caught in a storm that both ruined their engine and rendered their mast and sails useless. They were unable to contact help. They drifted for five months, living off of dry food and a handheld watermaker (takes the salt out of seawater so you can drink it) until they were rescued by a fishing boat and, eventually, the Navy.

Now here’s how much of their story makes sense:

They left Hawaii in May. They were rescued five months later by the Navy.

That’s it. That’s the only portion of their story that has even a shred of credibility to it. Now, I’m not going to speculate as to their motives yet, but I will point out that the world of open-water sailing is an obscure one to most people. I am one of a small minority to have spent a lot of time sailing on the open ocean, out of sight of land for months at a time. So I don’t blame journalists for not catching these things at first sight. But that’s why I’m here to explain them to you.

1. Food

These women were able to survive because they had vast stores of dry food on board —mainly oatmeal, pasta, and rice. I’m going to assume that they’re giving an incomplete picture of what they ate, because if that’s all they had they would have died. No question. The human body cannot live on carbs alone for five months, nor can the two dogs they had on board with them. Even ignoring the essential nutrients like vitamins, there are eight amino acids from protein and fats (11 for dogs) that the body cannot synthesize, without which you will die in a couple of months. Unfortunately, the Nazis performed just such an experiment, so we know this to be true.

So I’ll assume they also had some Centrum Silver and canned sardines on board that they didn’t talk about that kept them from dying. What I’m more concerned about is how they didn’t just starve to death.

See, most news outlets who’ve reported on this story say they had a year’s worth of food on board. The Independent quotes Appel as follows:

“They [experienced sailors in Hawaii] said pack every square inch of your boat with food, and if you think you need a month, pack six months, because you have no idea what could possibly happen out there.”

Not to put too fine a point on it, but that is utter horseshit. In my time living on boats, I undertook literally hundreds of overnight passages. Probably a dozen of them took more than a few days, and six took more than a week. One took two weeks, one took three. And at no point in those five years did anyone ever advise us to carry six times as much food as we might need, let alone 12. You see, the passage from Hawaii to Tahiti is 2600 miles.

Capture
Tahiti is very small, you’re going to have to trust me on this one.

In a boat like theirs (we’ll get to the boat), 120 miles in 24 hours is a very reasonable pace to expect. That’s a passage of 21 days. Three weeks. And you packed food for a year? That doesn’t make sense. An inexperienced sailor wouldn’t have thought to do that, and an experienced one would have known it wasn’t necessary.

And then there’s the matter of carrying that much food. Luckily, Costco sells a year’s worth of food, so we know what it looks like.

Untitled-1

That’s a year’s worth of food, for four people, at 1300 calories per person. For two people, it’s 2600 calories a day, which is a very reasonable amount to eat when you’re out at sea, moving around, pumping a hand desalinator all day long. It comes on a pallet and weighs 1800 pounds, and is an absolutely ludicrous amount of food to bring on board a 50-foot boat. These people were vastly overprepared in the food department.

But weirdly, they claim to have gone through 90% of their food by the time they were rescued. So did they bring six months’ supply or a year? And how did they go through it so quickly?

2. Water

You can’t drink seawater. More specifically, you can, but it’ll kill you, and pretty quickly at that. Appel claims that they made water using a desalinator, presumably a handheld one like this.

41WPHF132EL

That one will put out about a quart an hour. So mow much do they need?

Let’s assume that they’re each eating 1500 calories a day, and the two dogs are eating that between them (again, ignoring the fact that dogs can’t survive on a carb-only diet). That’s 4500 calories a day of oatmeal, pasta, and rice. They didn’t tell us how much of each they ate, but I did some poking around and found that 1000 calories of rice needs about three cups of water to prepare, while 1000 calories of oatmeal needs about 12. Pasta is somewhere in the middle. Let’s average it out to about 6 cups of water (1.5 quarts) per 1000 calories of food.

So for 4500 calories a day, they need 6.75 quarts of water. Now, how about drinking water? All the info I found said that humans need around two quarts a day, though they can survive on one quart a day if it’s absolutely necessary and they’re not exposed to too much sun. At two quarts a day, between them and the dogs, that’s another six quarts a day for a total of 12.75 quarts. That means between them, they’re operating the watermaker literally all day long. Granted, the boat had water tanks, but I don’t know how big they were. And if you’re outside in the sun, trying to fix the boat, working up a sweat, etc., those needs will go up. Surviving would be a struggle.

[EDIT 11/1/17: there are a ton of other desalinator options on the market that would meet their needs more easily, though they didn’t specify what kind they used. It also appears they have a wind generator in some of the photos, which might have made enough power to run an electric one, depending on conditions. Safe to assume water wasn’t an issue.]

Which brings me to my next point:

3. Their Condition

Take another look at these women.

45BD927E00000578-5023025-image-m-36_1509115447812

These are not women who are struggling to survive. They have not been dehydrated, or even operating at a caloric deficit, for five months.

vsa7xehsk9waasga9lx0

They are healthy enough to stand up and blow kisses at their rescuers, and the dog still has visible, healthy muscle tone.

hlb0rz0bvlg54k4kvznm

They are healthy enough to climb long ladders unassisted while smiling enthusiastically.

Do you see my point? These women and their dogs aren’t starving. They’re not close. They’re not even skinny. They have visible subcutaneous fat. Their faces are plump, not sunken and emaciated. Their skin isn’t burned, their lips aren’t chapped, there is no indication whatsoever that they’ve been through any kind of hardship. The dogs have shiny coats and strong muscles.

For contrast, I present Maurice and Maralyn Bailey.

175a

In 1973, their boat was sunk by a whale in the Pacific. They collected seawater and ate birds, fish, and turtles. They were out for 117 days (less than four months) before being rescued, and they each lost forty pounds. They look like Holocaust survivors. Jennifer Appel and Taisha Fuiva haven’t lost an ounce.

4. The Storm

Let’s backtrack to how they got stranded in the first place. They left Hawaii on May 3, and hit trouble right away. Appel claims they hit a storm with “force 11” winds on their first night.

Spinal_Tap_-_Up_to_Eleven
I had to.

“Force 11” is a reference to the Beaufort Scale, a somewhat archaic but still widely used scale of wind strength that goes from 1-12. 12 is a hurricane, 11 is 64-72 mph winds. Think about putting your hand out the window on the highway and you’ll know how scary that might be. The thing is, they say this happened on the first night. If they left at dawn on May 3, that means they’re at most 18 hours from Hawaii, or about 90 miles. And the highest wind speed that Hawaii experienced that entire week was under 30 mph. And that weather data is from Bradshaw Air Field, way up on Mauna Kea, so it’s not sheltered at all. Is it completely impossible that they were experiencing 70 mph winds less than 100 miles from the island? No. But it is profoundly unlikely.

Apparently, that storm rendered the sails unusable. Some reporters said that the mast “broke,” which it clearly didn’t, but I’ll let that slide as ignorant reporting. Pictures of the boat are a little suspicious, though.

Capture2

The mast is still upright, and the forestay, backstay, and shrouds (wires that hold the mast up) are still intact. The boom is still attached. The mainsail is down and, though sloppily folded, isn’t obviously damaged. The jib is neatly rolled, and both sheets are still attached. There is absolutely no indication that this boat isn’t capable of moving under its own power. I know I’m not on the boat and I haven’t examined it myself, but I’ve seen booms break. I’ve seen masts break. I’ve seen sails blow out. It is shockingly violent, and you are absolutely not able to put the sails away afterward in the way that these sails have been stowed.

[EDIT 11/1/17: one source mentions a damaged spreader, a structural component of the mast that I can’t assess from the photos. A damaged spreader might have prevented them from running at full sail in strong winds, but would not have immobilized the boat by any means. If the jib was intact, and it certainly seems to be, any competent sailor could have gotten the boat moving.]

Around May 30, Appel says they hit a second storm. Now, at this point, it’s been 27 days since they left. They should be there by now. To make the trip in 27 days requires a pace of only 96 miles a day. That is, by any boat’s standards, a snail’s pace. It’s an average speed of four knots, and that’s how long it would take to cover the entire distance to Tahiti. So where the fuck are they on May 30? Granted, you can only expect about 500 miles of range out of a marine motor, but if your sails are rendered unusable on May 3, you’re still 2500 miles from Tahiti, you’re only 90 miles from Hawaii, and you have to know your engine won’t get you to Tahiti, why wouldn’t you turn back?

Grudgingly, let’s move past that. Let’s assume they’re barely crawling south, under engine power only, knowing full well the engine can’t take them that far, and they’re somewhere in this region.

Capture3

From CNN’s video:

“we had no way to realize that we were about to enter a typhoon that had winds of 100 to 150 miles an hour and minimum wave heights of 40-foot height.”

Nope. Bullshit. Absolute bullshit. There is no fucking way that this is what happened. Firstly, look back at the boat. That mainsail is stowed very sloppily. It’s not folded right or lashed down properly. There’s no sail cover, for which I can think of no justification. It has many folds and loose parts for the winds to catch. 100-mph winds would have shredded that like a cat shreds toilet paper.

giphy
Here is a helpful visual aid.

Same goes for that canvas awning over the cockpit. That awning is probably 3’x4′ at the end, so using the formula F = 1/2(rho)*v^2*A*C for wind load, the awning is experiencing at least 4500 pounds of pressure on it. If the wind is dead on, it’s closer to 9000. There is simply no chance in hell that that boat, as it looks there, has been through 100+mph winds.

But don’t take my word for it. Turns out we keep track of these things. Let’s assume that despite their broken sails, they were still motoring south toward Tahiti. They’ve explicitly said that they decided not to turn back. There were only four hurricanes in the Pacific this year with winds in the Cat 3 or Cat 4 range like Appel describes, and SURPRISE, none of them happened until mid-July.

6ab5d95b9d4e607e5cca8e1426114d09

Also, none of them were within a thousand miles of this boat, but does that even matter at this point?

800px-2017_Pacific_hurricane_season_summary_map

So let’s recap. They left Hawaii on May 3. That night, they claim to have experienced Force 11 (~70mph) winds. That almost certainly didn’t happen. They claim that this storm rendered their sails unusable, which also almost certainly didn’t happen. Rather than turning back and limping home to Hawaii in less than a day on motor power alone like any sane sailor would have — and remember, Appel claims to have decades of sailing experience — they decided to press on, hoping for … what? The motor would have crapped out less than halfway there. The sails were unusable (again, I don’t believe them, but that’s what they say). There was absolutely no hope of getting where they needed to go, but they say they kept going for 27 days.

What were they doing for 27 days? God knows. They weren’t motoring. The motor in a boat like that is good for maybe 200 hours on a tank. Call it 10 days of barely puttering along. And then what? Two weeks of drifting? And only then, on May 30, 27 days after the first storm and 17 days after running out of fuel, the second storm of 100+ mph winds hit. That definitely didn’t happen, as evidenced by the boat itself and all of the weather data that we keep on big storms. Apparently, that storm “flooded” the motor, rendering it unusable. Only then, according to their story, were they truly stranded. But the motor couldn’t possibly have been functioning that long anyway, so what does it matter if it broke? None of this makes sense. But I’m not done yet.

5. Communication

Let’s talk about how one would signal for help in a situation like this. Several stories talk about how their cell phone fell overboard, but that’s completely irrelevant because it would have been useless a few hours into the trip so I’ll ignore it. From the same CNN video:

“We had no VHF — no range on it — no weather comm, no SSB, we didn’t have our HAM radio, and our radio telephone inside the boat was not working, also our Iridium sat phone was not working”

Let’s break those down.

VHF

51EnrCEdsYL._SL500_AC_SS350_

Stands for Very High Frequency radio, and is probably the most common radio used in the boating world for everything from day-to-day communication to emergencies. It’s basically line-of-sight though, so they weren’t close enough to use it. That checks out.

“Weather comm”

No idea what this means. You get weather reports on the open ocean via some other form of radio, not a separate piece of hardware, so I’m not sure what she means here.

SSB

ic-m700pro_02251403

Stands for Single Side Band radio, and is also extremely common for open-water sailors. If you’re ever out of sight of land, you probably have one of these. It bounces signals off of the ionosphere, meaning it can transmit past the curvature of the earth. Theoretically, it has a range of thousands of miles. That’s how you’d normally get weather reports out in the middle of nowhere. Apparently it was broken.

Ham

Ham radio really just means amateur radio. It covers a broader array of wavelengths than SSB, though in a marine context those won’t have the range either. In practical terms, ham radio and marine SSB are the same thing.

[EDIT 11/1/17: The reason I say that ham and marine SSB are the same thing is that on the open ocean, they’re both using SSB frequencies, so it wouldn’t make sense to have two separate pieces of hardware. You could, though.]

Same frequency band, same hardware. The only difference is who you’re allowed to talk to and what licensing you need. It makes no sense at all to say that both of them were broken, since they wouldn’t be two separate radios in the first place.

“Radio telephone”

Radio telephone is more of a system than a piece of hardware. It’s also known as ship-to-shore, and it’s pretty much obsolete. Basically you radio to a shore station, and the shore station operator calls someone on the phone and holds the phone up to the radio. It’s slightly more sophisticated than that, but not much. It also uses SSB frequencies. You can get ones that look like a walkie-talkie, but more likely you’d just use your onboard SSB. In any case, this was apparently also broken.

Iridium sat phone

Iridium-9555-Satellite-Phone-front

Iridium is a brand of satellite phone. It should theoretically work anywhere in the world except underground, but it also apparently wasn’t working. Maybe it was out of battery.

The last resort, if all of these fail and you can’t get help, is called an EPIRB. EPIRB stands for Emergency Position-Indicating Radio Beacon, and is hooked to a global network of GPS satellites. It looks like an really big walkie-talkie, usually with only one switch on it (“on”), and sometimes comes with other shit like a strobe light, orange dye, etc. It is utterly bombproof, waterproof, and foolproof. Some of them are even water-activated, so if you sink, it starts automatically.

10406908

When the nuclear holocaust happens and everything is ash, there will still be EPIRBs blinking away somewhere.

When an EPIRB turns on, it sends a signal to its satellite network. If you’re within 5000 miles of the Equator (70% of the Earth), it’ll be in range. It might take up to 45 minutes to lock on to a signal, and then another three minutes to alert emergency services. At that point, since you have to register an EPIRB to buy it, it’ll tell them not only where you are, but who you are and what kind of boat you have. It’s accurate to within 50 yards, updates every 20 minutes, and runs for 48 hours. After the EPIRB was activated, a Coast Guard plane from Hawaii could have reached this boat in six hours.

USCG_C130_Hercules
This has a range of almost 5,000 miles and there are four of them on Oahu right now.

The Navy could have been there in two days. So what about Appel’s EPIRB?

She didn’t even fucking turn it on.

Jennifer Appel confirmed in an interview Tuesday that they had the beacon and did not use it. She said that in her experience, it should be used only when you are in imminent physical danger and going to die in the next 24 hours.

“Our hull was solid, we were floating, we had food, we had water, and we had limited maneuverable capacity,” Appel said in Japan, where the U.S. Navy took them after they were rescued by a Navy ship. “All those things did not say we are going to die. All that said, it’s going to take us a whole lot longer to get where we’re going.”

No, woman, that is not how that works. You do not wait until you are hours from death to turn on the EPIRB, because it will probably take longer than that to get rescued. If you are stranded, you turn on the fucking beacon. If your sails and motor are broken, you turn on the fucking beacon. If you’re running out of food, you turn on the fucking beacon. And if, as you say in this video, you “honestly didn’t believe that we would survive another 24 hours,” you TURN ON YOUR FUCKING BEACON.

Philip R. Johnson, a retired Coast Guard officer, weighed in on their situation as well.

If the thing was operational and it was turned on, a signal should have been received very, very quickly that this vessel was in distress,” Phillip R. Johnson said Monday in a telephone interview from Washington state.

Appel and Fuiava also said they had six forms of communication that all failed to work.

“There’s something wrong there,” Johnson said. “I’ve never heard of all that stuff going out at the same time.”

The absolute worst case scenario, even if the month of May went as badly as they say it did (which is impossible), is that they turn on their EPIRB after the hurricane (that didn’t exist) hit them on May 30 (which it didn’t), and they’re home before Mother’s Day. There is absolutely no reason for their summer to have unfolded as it did. As the Denver Post put it, “Key elements of the women’s account are contradicted by authorities, and are not consistent with weather reports or basic geography of the Pacific Ocean.”

6. The Sharks

I know we’re 3500 words deep at this point, but we’re going to have to take a second to talk about the sharks.

tmp668615241583558656

Repeatedly, Appel mentions being in “a tiger shark location.” The phrase “shark-infested” has been thrown around. Tiger sharks are coastal animals, but you know what? I’ll grant that maybe there were sharks out there. That’s when it gets ridiculous.

“We were slowly maneuvering through their living room. They came by to slap their tails and tell us we needed to move along. They decided to use our vessel to teach their children how to hunt. They attacked at night. We were just incredibly lucky that our hull was strong enough to withstand the onslaught.”

“I’m telling you I’ve never seen any Stanley Cup winner come even close to the precision these five sharks had. Three would get on one side and two would get on the other side, and they would make waves and try to knock down the boat.”

“I told [the dogs] not to bark because the sharks could hear us breathing. They could smell us”

This is such utter and complete nonsense that I hardly know where to begin, so I’ll just do bullet points.

  • Tiger sharks are solitary.
  • Very few sharks hunt in packs. Tiger sharks are not among them (sand tiger sharks aren’t the same thing).
  • Sharks occasionally ram boats, but the chances of it breaching the hull are zero. Here is a much bigger shark ramming a much smaller boat and it still can’t overturn it. A 50-foot boat like that probably weighs 20 tons, and a big tiger shark weighs maybe half a ton. Plus, sharks only have cartilage, not bones. There’s no big, hard surface like a whale’s head to bash into stuff.
  • Sharks don’t teach their children how to hunt. They lay eggs and leave.
    [EDIT 10/31/17: Tiger sharks are one of the shark species that give live birth. The teaching thing stands.]
  • Sharks ABSOLUTELY do not coordinate to make waves to knock boats over. You are thinking of killer whales, which have nothing in common with tiger sharks except living in the ocean. This would require the ability to make waves, the coordination to make one big wave, some concept of how boats work, and sophisticated enough communication to organize the whole thing. Sharks have none of those things.
  • EVEN IF THEY DID, you just told us that your boat survived three days of 50-foot waves (it didn’t) and 100-mph winds (also no) and you think the sharks can top that? Even a pod of half a dozen orca can only muster about a 3-foot wave, and they’re about five times the size of tiger sharks.
  • Sharks can’t hear you breathing.
  • Sharks can’t smell you through a fucking boat, you fucking shitweasel.

I feel like I’m taking crazy pills.

Conclusion

Here’s what we know: Two women left Hawaii on a boat on May 3. Five months later, they were picked up 900 miles south of Japan.

They claim to have been hammered by multiple hurricane-force storms. That absolutely didn’t happen.

They claim to have been attacked by sharks. That absolutely didn’t happen.

They claim that their boat was rendered immobile. It absolutely wasn’t.

They claim that they packed a year’s worth of food, but that they somehow went through 90% of it.

They claim that all of their communications devices failed.

They admit to not turning on a distress beacon.

So what happened? Here’s my guess. Two women bought a shitload of food and put in on a boat, then sailed it a hundred miles off the coast of Hawaii and turned the motor off. They mussed up the sail a little bit (or just suck at stowing it in the first place), and just sat there, waiting for the trade winds and Equatorial Current to take them west, content in the knowledge that the boat wouldn’t sink and they wouldn’t run out of food until they reached Japan, if it came to that. When they finally made contact with a boat, they invented the sharks, the storms, the technical failures, the hardships, etc. They’re expecting publicity (mission accomplished) and maybe a book deal. Maybe a TV special. Maybe an episode of “I Shouldn’t Be Alive.” Hell, maybe a movie. They’re attention whores.

Luckily, I’m not the only person noticing the problems here. Multiple outlets are reporting that they never turned on their EPIRB. More are reporting inconsistencies with weather and timing. Their story is falling apart only days after it landed, partly because they can’t even keep it straight themselves. You’d think with five months of nothing to do, they could have at least invented a better narrative, but I guess not. They’re on their way to being exposed, as I hope they are. Fuck ’em.

Bonus tidbits

I’ve been obsessing over this story for days, and I keep turning up more shit. It’s an endless treasure trove of lies. Here’s a few I decided to leave out.

  • Appel claims that they couldn’t turn back to Hawaii after the first (made-up) storm because there were no harbors deep enough for a boat the size of theirs. Ignoring the fact that they had just left Hawaii, the islands are also home to several enormous marinas, a Coast Guard base, and PEARL FUCKING HARBOR. If it can hold the Navy, it can hold your 50-footer.
  • They say that their tech was all broken before May 30, which is why they didn’t see the storm coming, but then they say they sent out distress calls for five months. On what?
  • They say a “white squall” flooded the engine. A white squall is a sudden burst of wind out at sea that whips up the waves and makes whitecaps. It is not accompanied by rain. That’s called a black squall, named for the dark clouds that come with it. Anyone with the experience Appel claims to have should know better.
  • She says the squall “dropped copious amounts of water and it flooded the cockpit, which actually ended up flooding the ignition and the starter for the boat.” Believe it or not, the cockpit does not actually drain directly into vital engine components, in the same way that the gutters on your roof do not drain on to your home theater. Also, boat ignition systems are waterproof since, you know, they’re on boats.
  • The engine is below decks. It is not open to the outdoors. If there’s enough water in the engine bay to disable it, the boat is probably well on its way to sinking.
  • Appel says “we got pushed into what’s called the Devil’s Triangle, where boats go in, but they very rarely come out. And if they do, there are no people on them.” Firstly, the Devil’s Triangle is another name for the Bermuda Triangle, which is in a different ocean. Secondly, the legends of the Bermuda Triangle are completely unsubstantiated, like alien abductions or Bigfoot sightings. It’s possible that she was referring to the Devil’s Sea or Dragon’s Triangle, different names for a similarly myth-shrouded area of the Pacific. Except they weren’t in that part of the ocean. And besides, there is no magic area of the Pacific with skeleton-filled ships floating in limbo forever.
  • Appel says she took two years planning this trip. It doesn’t take two years to plan one month on a boat. You fill up the fuel tank, take one day to go to the grocery store, check all the vital systems (like maybe your SIX FUCKING RADIOS), and head out. One week of prep, as long as the boat doesn’t need major maintenance.
  • Appel describes telling Fuiava about the trip as follows: “When I asked Natasha, I told her I have no idea what’s going to happen out there and she said, ‘That’s OK, I’ve never sailed.’” That is super not ok. One person cannot operate a 50-foot boat for three hours without help, let alone three weeks. Two people are already stretched thin, given that someone has to be awake 24/7 to keep watch, and that’s if they both know what they’re doing. I wouldn’t dare do this trip with two people. No experienced sailor would set off on a trip like this with a useless copilot they’d just met, and no sane human being would agree to a three-week boat trip with a stranger who says they have no idea what to expect.
2d4f644844e2c97477931ff9adf261eff3f234165981800e03d0fcbcaa709d93
  • Also, why didn’t you have any idea what was going to happen out there?! I’ve personally sailed a very similar voyage from the Galapagos to French Polynesia. It took 23 days, at the same time of year, in the same trade winds and currents, and I’ll tell you what happens out there. NOTHING. It is boring as shit. The winds don’t change. The temperature is balmy. The sea stretches in every direction. You adjust the sails once a week. You watch for big ships (there aren’t any). You catch some fish. You read a lot of books. One of the most exciting moments is when the ETA on your GPS blinks over from –:– to 99:59, and then you still have four days left. It is an exceedingly uneventful way to pass the time.
  • They claim that they were able to get their crippled boat, without sails, to cover the 1000 miles to Christmas Island, part of the island nation of Kiribati, but didn’t try to land because “It is uninhabited. They only have habitation on the northwest corner and their reef was too shallow for us to cross in order to get into the lagoon.” Christmas Island is home to 2,000 people and regularly hosts much larger ships.
trip-to-kiritimati-1
It has a fucking airport… [EDIT: I should clarify that this is a generic visual aid for airport, not the actual Kiribati airport]
  • When asked if the small island would have been a good place to land and repair their sails, Appel said no. “Kiribati, um, one whole half of the island is called shipwreck beach for a reason.” It’s not. It’s called Bay of Wrecks, it’s a small area on the east side, and the REST OF THE ISLAND is fine.
  • Instead of stopping in Kiribati, they decided they “could make it to the next spot,” which, in their mind, was the Cook Islands. The Cook Islands are 1600 miles from Kiribati, too far to go by motor alone even if the motor hadn’t failed, and past the original destination of Tahiti. That, apparently, was a better option than just going to the OTHER FUCKING SIDE of Kiribati, if they were even at Kiribati, which I doubt.
  • The Coast Guard made radio contact with a vessel that identified itself as the Sea Nymph near Tahiti in June, well after the alleged boat-crippling storms, and the captain said they were not in distress and expected to make land the next morning. Either it was a different Sea Nymph (plausible) or they somehow managed to fuck that up and ended up 5,000 miles west of there instead.

More Bonus Tidbits (as of 11/1)

It’s only been 24 hours since I posted this and more shit keeps coming up.

  • They have doubled down on their claim that they encountered 30-foot waves and hurricane-force winds on the night they left, despite no evidence that any such storm existed. Even very generously assuming that they mean 30-foot swell — caused by large scale wind and weather — and not 30-foot waves — caused by the storm you’re in right at that moment — doesn’t account for the lack of evidence of the wind.
  • “We got into a Force 11 storm, and it lasted for two nights and three days,” Appel said Tuesday.” No, you didn’t. Any storm that strong and that long would have showed up on radar, which is live 24 hours a day and updated every three hours. The storm didn’t exist. This is as clear-cut a lie as there could be. It’s like lying about what time it is.
  • Appel’s mother told the AP that she called the Coast Guard to report Jennifer missing about a week and a half into their trip. Not only is that too early to report someone missing if they’re supposed to be on a 3-week trip, but the Coast Guard say they never got such a call. They received a call from a “family friend” they identified as a male on May 19, still several days before the women expected to arrive.
  • The women said they filed a float plan listing their course and other details with some friends and relatives. In an interview with the Coast Guard, the women said they had filed no float plan. You don’t have to file a float plan. It’s not like a flight plan. But in general, it’s a good idea to tell people, “if you don’t hear from me in a month, tell the Coast Guard.”
tumblr_lud0n1uJ2I1qmkbfvo1_500
  • MORE MAGIC SHARK MADNESS. Apparently they claim the tiger sharks were 20-30 feet long. They don’t get that big. Also, according to CBS, “University of Hawaii professor and veteran shark researcher Kim Holland has never heard of any kind of shark repeatedly attacking a boat hull throughout a night. He also said tiger sharks never jump out of the water and do not make coordinated attacks.”
  • They’re now saying that they contacted someone on Wake Island, after previously saying that they weren’t ever able to contact anyone. They didn’t land on Wake Island, though, because they weren’t able to navigate the two-ish miles to the other side of the island to land. So no one could come out and tow them in? No one on Wake Island reported an adrift vessel? Wake Island has about 100 members of the Air Force on it at any given time and a substantial airstrip, there’s no reason a rescue couldn’t have been mounted from there.
  • They’ve changed their story about the fishing vessel that originally contacted them. Originally they said they were kind, but now report that they feared for their safety. They claim that the fishing boat damaged their boat, and then Appel said, “I also believe that they knew they were damaging the boat. And if we couldn’t get additional help, that boat would sink, and they would get … two girls to do whatever they wanted to.”
  • In one account, they said that Fuiava had to swim to the fishing boat to tell them to stop damaging the boat while towing it. Not only is it ludicrously impossible that a swimming person could catch a boat in motion, but it’s also not especially plausible that towing a boat would cause it damage. And if it were, they could have just cut the rope and TURNED ON THEIR FUCKING BEACON.
  • The captain of the fishing vessel says he saw someone waving a flag on a boat about a mile from him. When he went over, they asked to use his sat phone, and for him to tow them to Midway Island, which is almost 2000 miles from where they were. He towed them overnight, at which point they asked to be turned loose and called the Navy instead. He also says he offered them water and food, which they declined.
  • Mike Michelwait, owner of the Honolulu Sailing Company, says he’s made the trip from Hawaii to Tahiti several times, but wouldn’t try it with only two people. “There’s only two of them on board, and it’s a 50-foot boat,” he said. “That’s a lot of boat to handle.”

Even More Bonus Tidbits (as of 11/2)

I can’t help myself.

  • Fuiava claims to have lost 70 pounds during the trip, despite having a year’s worth of food, despite almost running out of food in five months. And if that clusterfuck wasn’t enough, her clothes still fit fine.
  • That line of green shit on the boat is majorly suspicious.
    Capture

    Normally, you’re supposed to clean your bottom paint every 2-4 months, depending on where your boat is (green scum grows faster in warm water). You’re also supposed to paint the boat’s waterline (the barrier between white and blue, in this case) roughly where the water sits when the boat is in the water. You can see in the screenshot that that’s the case. The blue is relatively clean because it’s what’s called “bottom paint,” which is engineered to repel algae/barnacle/mussel growth. The white isn’t supposed to be underwater at all. But the green stuff only grows under prolonged submersion, so what’s it doing so high on the white?


    Glad you asked. Green scum up that high on the boat indicates that the boat was sitting much lower in the water than it was when they got picked up, and for a long time. For perspective, this couple writes about getting rid of 1200 pounds of stuff and rising two inches in the water, and that’s on a (relatively very light) 5-ton catamaran. Shedding weight will have more impact the lighter the boat is. A 50-foot sloop like the Sea Nymph probably weighs more like 20 tons, and that’s before the 5-6 tons of extra fiberglass and keel that Appel claims to have added on. All the food and water they went through in five months can’t come close to accounting for what looks like two feet of waterline difference. That boat looks to have been seriously weighed down for a very long time.

I don’t know what the fuck happened. But I do know these women are full of shit.

353 responses

  1. I myself have never heard of these two women before reading this article either, but you can bet I want to know more and follow the story. I think these two fools took a slip aboard their vessel and took a nasty bump to the head,cause their lines are just too full of holes to be even close to being credible. Thank you sir for this very enjoyable read, and would love to read more of your articles!

  2. Great, fabulous! An analysis like this has been missing ever since some of the ladies’ lies were discovered a few days ago. Straight to the points. One realises the writer is a sailor (I am one as well). Incredible how badly prepared the whole story is, all the claims about the storms are so easily destroyed by the meteorology people. I also think that they started their epic „drift“-adventure soon after they left Honolulu – but haven’t calculated the probable speed in the SE monsoon wind. I would very much like to know: 1) what is wrong with the motor, 2) there seems a piece of the top of the mast missing (a spreader? even though the rig does not look like that), how did that happen and did it make the mast unstable?, 3) what is the damage allegedly made by the Taiwanese fishing boat, 4) why is the boat considered not seaworthy?, 5) will really nobody do a proper damage assessment on that ship? If not the Coastguard, at least an investigative journalist? This would deter people from dishing up similar ridiculous fake news.

    I hope your account will reach and influence the big media.

    Greetings from Bavaria, Wulf Schiefenhövel

    1. The two women will NEVER let anyone examine their boat, radios, motor, sails, food supply, etc. Never. Or at least till they have got them in line with their stories.

      1. Actually the boat was declared unseaworthy and abandoned by the Navy ship that picked them up, so it might never be found.

      2. DangerOnion, when the ship was abandoned, it would have been blown out of the water to keep it from becoming a hazard if it drifts into the shipping lanes. Makes for very good target practice.

      3. Greg, apparently that never happened. I saw somewhere that Appel still has hopes of recovering he boat.

  3. I was thinking many of the same things. I was a sailer LONG ago. I have ZERO big water sailing experience, but even I came up with some of these same conclusions. At first, I was attracted to this story, AND MY IMMAGINATION WANTED TO FOLLOW… but my gut was screaming BS too.
    Thanks for a good read.

  4. I really enjoyed that read. If you wrote books I’d definitely read one. (I’m a published author, I wrote Caterpillar Seas, a memoir about the time (I was twenty-one) I stole a yacht in Hawaii and sailed it to Fiji. If I could I’d send you a Kindle edition)

    1. Hi Rob, -I love to read the true story of that adventure – I remember vague rumors of your exploits!! This was an excellent breakdown of some rookie mistakes. Judy Provoyeur

  5. Their ‘rescue’ came the day after I watched All is Lost with Robert Redford. It was a strange coincidence. Still, in the movie he deteriorated rapidly over a matter of days, these girls not so much. But what really pisses me off is that they felt the need to drag those innocent dogs into their stupid and dangerous scheme.

    1. Just have to read about the Indy and know that it only takes hours for someone to deteriorate that quick in Summer on the Ocean, even at winter. There is a reason that this fabricated tale does not even come close to being a Lifetime movie.

  6. I guess there’s a few things I could add here. The author mentioned a lot and I didn’t keep. It’s but roughly I’ll hit a few from my wife and my own experience as noob sailors ( still noobs). First I haven’t heard any nay Sayers doubt they were at sea for five months. We spent 6 days at the e d of June in the maximum gulfstream off the Nc coast. My wife ( new to boating at all o my married a mo th at the time our dog pit bull and cat were all sea sick the first four days or so and useless). I was extremely tired, dehydrated even though I drank close to two gallons of water a day. By the time we made a marina we were extremely loopy headed and physically exhausted. If the crew at the marina didn’t tie our 26′ boat up for us I reckon I was so beat I might’ve just tossed a small anchor over the dock. We were in a daze for a few days. If ya tried to interview us we would have misspoken or got details wrong like with added fully perceived extra drama. We have experienced more than one time in the past four or five months that tremendous 50,60, maybe 70 mph winds have come for a few minutes on the front of a thunderstorm a ” black squall” as the author might put it. Would have been far more dramatic at sea. The author says that he wouldn’t attempt to run that big sailboat with one other inexperienced crew. That alone should add potential viability to their account of events. We personally experienced several glitches with equipment all in the same couple of day even all in a couple of hours. Granted most of our stuff is second hand older beat up jerry rigged stuff most might call junk. I don’t know the condition of their equipment. It is certainly possible if ya take out the high dollar yachtie resources from the equation. We had our own mainsail sloppily lashed to the boom like these broads and had one game recently that lasted close to 24 hours with gusts up to 45 knots and probably more cuz noaa seems to u derestimate everything. As far as going thru the food goes. I know we do a lot of eating and snacking through our provisions and it’s not too far fetched for me to imagine these chicks munching away and stuffing the dogs full of “treats”. Let’s be real here. All us pet owners live our dogs n cats and would probably give them munchies while we’re munching. When all the munchies are gone oatmeal and rice become munchies. Dunno about the watermaker thing. I reckon they likely left out that they collected some of the easy water that may have fallen from the sky, a fifty foot or whatever boat would have a pretty hefty fresh wTer tank, they might e. Fought bottles or jugs of water. A lot of chicks like drinking bottled water. It’s a popular thing these days. Who knows what about their shark tales. Obviously a pack of tiger sharks didn’t do all sorts of coordinated attacks. I have caught tremendous tiger sharks from the beach and out to a. Pulls of hundred miles offshore. I suspect with a little research one could find wether a tagged and fracked mature tiger shark crosses oceans or at least travels thousands of miles there’s plenty of ways to rebut the ” experienced sailor” naysayer. These gals may very well be full of shit. Even if they are 5 months at sea on a boat adrift is quite an accomplishment. I highly doubt for any amount of perceived future money or fame that two women ,one with no experience at least, would be able to make it through that long without having a nervous breakdown and forcing the otherexperienced one to take her home. Not a far stretch of my imagination that even the threat of force at butcher knife point to force the issue would occur. I commercial fished for years and have seen grown me. Especially greenhorns lose their minds and try to pull some psychopathic stunts to get back to shore. My own wife at one point was threatening to take our epirb and jump off the boat in 30 knot winds and very high seas after about 4 1/2 day when she finally wasn’t so sea sick that she could muster the strength to threaten it. They probably have embellished the story a bit. They may have done it on purpose. I dunno. Oh and as far as carrying a to. Of food goes perhaps they didn’t know what the food situation would be like in Tahiti. Low on funds like we always are and wanted to get food from a major grocer in a place with competition for groceries? Not wanting to land somewhere that the price of 8 ounces of cheddar is $8 maybe. The place we landed in after our first trip ocracoke Nc is serviced only. BY ferry has only one small independant grocer and food was double price or more than a standard mainland grocery store chain. Just my two cents as an inexperienced sailor with an inexperienced at boating or ocean crew.

    1. You make some great points too. Your bit about the wife and the Epirb is classic. Thanks for a great read.. gonna send your bit on this to my boyfriend so we can continue arguing this story a few more days.. (we just bought our first boat). Cheers!

      1. Lewis perhaps your wife wanted to bail from a s dust pig who calls women chicks, gals and broads.

    2. Reading your response I am trying to decide if you are a trolling bot, or really that stupid. Nothing in your description of your sailing adventure parallels the story these women. The NOAA neither exagerates nor diminishes wind velocities. They use this stuff called “science” and can calculate velocities with extreme accuracy. And there were no storms when the women said there were within hundreds, if not thousands, of miles of them. We have satellite photos to demonstrate this. Neither the women, nor the dogs, were dehydrated nor malnourished. And Tahiti is a very popular tourist destination with significant grocery stores and other supplies. The author of this column has it right, and you are so off in the weeds as to be unfindable.

      1. I know noaa uses ” science” but if u think that their weather reports are always even close to accurate ur quite wrong or maybe you haven’t spent much time on the water. I’m quite aware of the no known three day storms. Just bear with me here for a moment. Even if you’ve never been on the water I’m quite sure you have experienced quite strong ( 50-70) mph winds on the front of an isolated thunderstorm. I can envision some broads going down beliwduring a thunderstorm or maybe as the author calls it a ” black squall”. Maybe getting some sleep and some other scattered thunderstorms passing thru periodically. i believe they may not have all the little details from the beginning of their five months straight. Folks tend to get a little loopy after only five or ten days on the water generally if they’re not experienced and from my experience 85 percent of the folks I meet on the water have never even spent a week without touching land. I don’t know about Tahiti , but I d certainly been to isolated places even in the Caribbean where groceries are outrageous. We don’t know the budget these gals were on. Don’t know if their boat was covered in barnacles. Don’t know what condition their equipment was in. I have personally experienced lots of malfunctioning second hand equipment that was working fine when we left. Not a troll but o think folks are just jumping to conclusions because they’re trying to insert their own experiences into the gals story. Have you ever been at sea for five months in a small boat rocking and rolling without dropping anchor and going to shore or stopping at a marina? I highly doubt it. I haven’t. Have you ever even been isolated from other people and conveniences for five months straight? I have. You ? I doubt it. Have you ever tried sailing on a tight budget wiith shitty equipment? Perhaps. I have. Memories can get weird. When ya finally get around people it’s very surreal and can be quite dramatic. The author wrote in his own words the boat would be very hard to sail or impossible to sail single handedly or even with a greenhorn. That’s basically his words. Sooo, if you agree with the author the. Surely you also agree the boat would be nearly impossible for Appel to sail right? If that’s is the case the. Surely you would agree that it doesn’t matter what the condition of the rigging and sails are because Appel couldn’t sail it single gandedly or with an inexperienced crew member. Much less keep it on some course. The girls aren’t mechanics I don’t think. They’re not qualified to say y their diesel wouldn’t run any longer. Right? As far as sharks go I can envision some bait fish hanging around u set their boat at night and larger fish around the bait fish and then sharks feeding on the bigger fish. Could look like sharks ” attacking” the boat to somebody that doesn’t know any better. If you’ve spent years fishing and boating offshore then surely you know that fish often hang around drifting debris like magi mahi for just one obvious example. They could be full of shit. Hanging out in a sailboat for five months adrift is so hardcore I can’t fathom that two broads did it as a stunt and both of them were able psychologically to handle it. I wouldn’t think many bad ass navy sailors or marines could deal with it just to get some fame much less and especially a girl with no water experience. Not a troll here for ur information, but also not a drone dummy like ninety percent of modern society that can’t imagine living without Internet, cell service, grocery stores etc. Oh and as far as not looking malnourished they said they had food and water. So y would they be thin and haulocausty looking? Food plus water equals not skin and bones. There’s some science for ya.

    3. I have a bridge in New York for sale – I know it sounds unusual – but it was given to me by a relative who recently died – I will sell it to you for $100,000 – I really dont need the bridge – I live in Texas. send money please.

    4. No, you’re an idiot. You’re using mental gymnastics to try to make their story true simply because you want it to me. The thing that gets me is when you say that you can’t trust NOAA because weather forecasts are wrong. Here’s the thing, dipshit, “forecasts” may be wrong, but records tend not to be. If NOAA says there weren’t any three day storms in that area (and no fucking typhoons like the twit claimed happened later on), then there weren’t any fucking storms. You’re reaching in order to validate a blatantly false story because you, for some reason, desperately want it to be true. You’re insulting the intelligence of everyone here with your bullshit “well what if” and “well it could have” nonsense. I’m not sure why you’re trying so hard to defend these liars, but seriously, take your arguments and go fuck yourself with them.

  7. Enjoyable read, good points for the most part, although at least a few of his assumptions may be off.

    For example, he makes a big deal about the Katadyn Survivor 06, which I agree doesn’t add up. Designed for small life raft use, it has limited output as noted. But it is more likely to have either been a larger Survivor 35, a more common back-up for a boat, with plenty of output, or perhaps manual back-up operation of the boat’s electrically-powered desalintor,

    Also, while i agree that a well found boat could be launched in a week on a similar voyage, fact is most such voyages are months or years in the making, so I think that point is way off from a generic standpoint.

    Having said all that, to more information that comes out, more I have to agree with the assessment that this is a BS survival story.

    Doug Ritter
    Editor
    Equipped To Survive
    URL: http://www.equipped.org

    1. It’s true that I don’t know what kind of watermaker they were using, but I can safely assume it was handheld if they claim their motor died a month in. No way a house battery would last that long. And I saw no indication of solar panels.

      1. In one of the full size pics of the boat, it looks like they have a wind turbine and a solar panel deck above the stern. That could support a battery operated water maker. In another article she said they lost the masthead antenna which could render all but the handhelds inop. But seriously, in five months who couldn’t come up with a temp antenna, especially with nothing better to do. Gilligan’s island had a bike powered radio a week after getting to the island. Also what’s with the “adding 12000 lbs of fiberglass and lengthening the keel”… now she’s a naval architect too?

        TJ
        Merchant Mariner

  8. How do I subscribe to you?

    1. I’m pretty sure you can subscribe via WordPress to get an email when I post, or you can follow me on Facebook.

  9. We do need you to run for political office.Thanks for calling it like it is,for a compelling story that explains in layman’s terms the art of,and their bullshit reguarding,sailing.May the wind ALWAYS be at your back.

  10. #1. I don’t know how you would know that “they haven’t lost an ounce.”. The Fuiava said she lost 70 lbs!
    #2. They stated that they also had beans, nuts and dried fruit on board.
    I don’t know them, but just think facts should be accurate.

  11. Awesome read! Made my morning very enjoyable. I was laughing my ass off.

  12. its cool that you only let the positive shit though. very rosey happy and all of the same hive mind…

    1. I approved the one where you called me a “narcist,” even though that’s not a word. I think that’s pretty charitable of me.

  13. The first time I read about this story when the news broke, I knew it was complete bullshit. And I know NOTHING about sailing! It was mostly the food supply – with dogs, and the shark story that really bothered me. It’s so refreshing that there is someone out there that is able to poke holes in every single detail of their nonsense.

  14. Oleaginous Outrager Avatar
    Oleaginous Outrager

    So they had fruits and nuts, and one said she lost 70 lbs? Well case closed then! There’s no explanation of how they still look so water-fat after their “ordeal”, but I guess that’s just our lying eyes.

    The shark story alone is so moronic as to beggar belief. Add in the “fact” that all of their comms suffered complete failure at roughly the same time, but they still felt using the EPIRB was “unnecessary”, and this truly is a whopper of a fish story.

    1. And she didn’t mention that they had a sewing machine on board. You know, the one she used to take in her clothes since they were still tight on her when she was rescued even after she lost 70 pounds.

  15. This is the best damn article I read in a long time. Your a genius.

    1. Well written! Enjoyed every word and couldn’t agree more with your assessment of the entire, ridiculous situation!

  16. Sailing Infidels Avatar

    Good analysis! You missed the boat size discrepancy though. By my estimation (taking a measurement of Fuiava sitting on the combing and applying the result repeatedly along the length of the boat) I come up with a (very approximated) measurement of 30 ft LOA. I read elsewhere that the Sea Nymph is registered to Appel as a 37 ft vessel.

  17. Nice takedown. Concerning the water though, shouldn’t the water used for cooking grains still be counted towards their daily two quarts? It was either absorbed by the food and then consumed or the leftover still drinkable, if a bit starchy.

  18. I too love your writing techniques. I find it a bit ironic…. employing your talent for writing to share with us, the readers, a series of events that are far fetched and soaked with embellishment and and made up statements from two attention seeking women, who suffer from a severe lack of common sense, but just want attention.

    It’s like- here’s a story of two women lost at sea, stranded, with no way to contact the outside world (except the emergency beacon, of course), no “weather radio” warnings to prepare for the danger that lay ahead; these two bozo’s floated directly through shark infested waters in the dead of the night to find that danger was already upon them when they felt their boat being struck as the sharks carried out the first of what later became a sinisterly coordinated series of attacks led by hungry sharks who smelled the women through steel plates/metal of the boat. shockingly, the boat and it’s terrified passengers made it out of those waters but only reach even deadlier waters. The brutal force of 80mph winds, colliding against ocean waters and all in its path and the treacherous weather conditions they would later face at the hand of Mother Nature (her other hand was busy working hard to shield surrounding areas while disabling weather technology to block all the activity data coming from our Bozos’ hurricane). There they would face not one, not two, but three or maybe four unbelievable challenges to survive.

    By wasting your talent writing a very good, detailed and in depth piece about claims that only an 8 year old could believe, doesn’t that give them exactly what they set out to, very stupidly, achieve? I would go as far as to say the article does more (in writing) than they would’ve ever dreamed. It’s Certainly gives more than any of the 100-250 words articles any “news” company published out there….

  19. Although I do have sailing experience, it’s limited. However, it’s plenty to have created a framework of serious doubt from their story. With your detail? Pretty complete puzzle (other than what the hell they were doing.)

    On a more meta note, your post reminds me of the things I post on FB regarding politics, military incidents (Former Marine,) technology and much more. Things that I actually I know more about than sailing. 🙂

    Thank you for having critical reasoning skills which, unfortunately, are severely lacking.

  20. From what I understand, they were forced to abandon their boat. (Appel made a comment about wanting to go back out and find it.) It doesn’t make a lot of sense that they are seeking fame/fortune while at the same time losing a $100K (more or less) sailboat. My guess is there is mental illness in the mix, not conspiracy.

    1. That was my line of thinking as well

  21. I’d like to comment but I’m currently lost somewhere on Mount Kilimanjaro w/o any communication abilities and not another soul in site. I’ll wait until I’m about to die before I make a signal fire.

    1. Careful, Steven…I’ve heard tales of that place. When you see the black clouds cometh, head for shelter, for soon the sky sharks will descend upon you to steal your dried rice and macaroons.

  22. Enjoyed your article. When it very first came out I thought it was fishey. I thought maybe they were delivering drugs to another boat and will get paid sometime after their big rescue. But, it does make sense they got big dreams of Hollywood.

  23. Think we’ll start telling our kiddo that the sharks can smell her in her V berth… maybe she’ll start changing her socks out more often…. thanks crazy ladies!

  24. Umm..boat Diesel engines don’t have ignition systems ….

  25. My dad was stationed on Johnston Island for six months and knows these two idiots are full of shit. I was in the Navy and these two are full of shit. It also does not take a rocket scientist to know that they are full of shit. A boy scout even could tell them that they are full of shit.

    I did love the part where the idiot claimed that she had added up to six thousand pounds of fiberglass to the boat. It would have fucking capsized from that.

  26. Having solo sailed across the Pacific on a 31 foot boat I watched this news story with total disbelief. Everything sounded sketchy the boat look perfectly fit to sail they look well fed and for the life of me I don’t know how you can get lost for five months head west you’re going to hit something. Shark attacks really? Force 11 winds really? I’m not sure who they’re trying to fool and I listen to a lot of sailing stories but none that is so totally implausible that I can only chuckle.
    Whatever their motivation is they clearly failed in the creative writing portion of it. Sorry ladies there’s not a sailor I know who would believe that bullshit

  27. Big Dick Johnson Avatar
    Big Dick Johnson

    It’s entirely possible that the fat one may have been over 600 pounds at the start of the voyage. That would explain why only 90 per cent of the food was eaten. She has a pretty face though.

  28. Great post, I only have experience being on the water when I was in the Navy, but when I saw them and their dogs looking so healthy I was skeptical. And the idea that all of those devices would fail all at once was pretty far fetched. I bet they didn’t use their EPIRB because if they used it and were rescued and then their story was proven false, they would face legal repercussions. As it stands, it seems that they wouldn’t get in trouble because the rescue was “thrust” upon them.
    Your detailed knowledge about the other points of failure were pure gold, it was great entertaining read.

  29. bronsonbitsandpieces Avatar
    bronsonbitsandpieces

    Great read. I laughed most of the way through it and learned a tadbit about boating for fun or publicity!

  30. Awesome read – These fools should have deployed that beacon night one. 2 of the most attention starved, annoying individuals. I feel sorry for the dogs, stuck on a boat for 5 months so they could get a book deal.

  31. Granville Scott Avatar

    Excellent analysis. Allow me to add:

    1. They didn’t file a float plan? It’s customary for sailors to chart their course in advance, determine their schedule & ports of call, and leave this itinerary with people ashore, so that red flags will be raised if they don’t show up as planned.

    2. Even if you have enough food, water and fuel to operate in open water for weeks at a stretch, would you? Smart sailors don’t. They plan stops along their route to replenish supplies, so that you don’t get surprised by a storm when you’re running low on fuel.

    The only story that makes sense is that they were trying to get lost….their plan was to get as far away from Hawaii as possible, and not in the direction of Tahiti. They took as much food, water and fuel as they could pack, so they wouldn’t risk being seen in any ports, and probably planned to be in The Seychelles before anyone started looking for them. There, they could re-paint, re-register and sell the boat, and be presumed “lost at sea”….

  32. While I agree with much of what you said, you’re completely and utterly wrong to claim that “One person cannot operate a 50-foot boat for three hours without help, let alone three weeks” and it’s hard to see how an experienced sailor could get that idea.

    Way back in 1972, before modern sailhandling gear was perfected, the 127 foot Vendredi Trieze was raced across the Atlantic singlehanded. In the 1976 singlehanded Transatlantic, Alain Colas sailed Club Med, which was no less than 236 feet long, alone!

    Many people not only sail 50 footers alone, they have been doing so around the world for decades and there are regular events in which singlehanders race 60 footers around the world nonstop.

  33. What about that scum line on the hull?? The boat must have been so loaded with food that it was actually sitting much lower in the water for the scum line to be so far up the side! And I hope they didnt throw all the rubbish over the side! The boat would have looked like a tip after eating a years worth of food in 5 months! Lol

  34. […] Along with their two dogs, who survived, they appear perfectly healthy. Which is odd, right? Well, here’s your definitive takedown as to why their story is likely a bunch of malarkey. There’s a lot to savor, but here’s my favorite […]

  35. […] Along with their two dogs, who survived, they appear perfectly healthy. Which is odd, right? Well, here’s your definitive takedown as to why their story is likely a bunch of malarkey. There’s a lot to savor, but here’s my favorite […]

  36. Very interesting breakdown. I certainly smelled some fishyness when this came out. One point of disagreement, one person CAN handle a 50′ boat by themselves on a long passage. The Singlehanded TransPac solo race runs every other year from SF to Hawaii (2120nm) and some skippers also solo deliver their boats back home. This race has been run since the late 70s, and in monohulls up to 60′ long. Most competitors are in the 24′ to 40′ range, it is true. Typical passage time is 15 days over, 21 days back.

  37. You are my hero!!!

  38. Matthew Rounseville Avatar
    Matthew Rounseville

    What is with that discoloration or algae along the hull above the waterline? Looks like the boat was sitting in the mud for a long time. Or would you expect to see this on a boat that been out at sea for a long time? And those ladies don’t look very weathered for having been out on the ocean for five months. I look worse than that after a day at the beach trying to surf.

  39. Sidelined Sailor Avatar
    Sidelined Sailor

    Brutal storm on their first night? When you’re preparing your trio for years, and you have the benefit of all the shoreside weather resources, you choose to depart when you have a clear westher window, decent weather for the next accurately foreseeable period, 3-5 days. You would never head out for 21 days without studying what is coming at you. On shore we don’t even plan picnics on a Sunday without checking Friday’s weather!

  40. It all boils down to – One big lie in the age of social media to become famous and wealthy, end of story. Two women lost at sea they thought they’d be on Ellen by now.

  41. Great analysis, but I found it alarming your use of te word ‘whore’ and women. The tag is then stupid people- why not ‘stupid women’?. I suspect you think this was just a fact. Two women stranded etc… but at times it reads as if it’s from a mysogynistic perspective.
    You may disagree. The gender is irrelevant in your analysis (which is, otherwise, a great read)

    1. The tag is “stupid people” because I have other posts under that tag and it doesn’t make sense to fragment my tags too much. The phrase “attention whore” refers to “a person who behaves in a provocative, outrageous, or reprehensible manner in order to attract attention,” and its connection to gender is purely incidental. And the fact that they’re women is irrelevant — two men in the same situation would have drawn equal derision. I appreciate your feedback, but any perceived misogyny is unintended.

      1. I agree with Eli Peaeli, loved the analysis and the swearing, but there are a couple of misogynistic phrases. “No, woman, that is not how that works.” is a bit cringey if you think about how a gender-reversal affects the tone. And the gendered connotations of phases like “attention whore” are not incidental to the women who are disproportionately on the receiving end of the label (link below).

        No sure if you care about this stuff, I just came across your blog and intend on reading more.

        http://www.rookiemag.com/2013/05/shameless-women/

  42. looks like they were smoking the “merchandise” for 5 months.

    someone in tahiti is missing a “delivery”

    1. This. They were on a trip, alright, but not a pleasure trip. Trippin and getting high on their own supply.

  43. What about the 10 knot current they said they experienced…is that like a horizontal waterfall. Do those currents actually exist.?

    1. No, except for in breaks in coral atolls. The Gulf Stream is about 4-5 knots at its strongest. Even the Strait of Gibraltar is rarely that strong. There is no large-scale 10-knot current anywhere in the world’s oceans.

  44. So what actually DID take place ?

  45. A 50 foot sailboat, regardless of age, is not cheap. This boat is now abandoned somewhere in the Pacific Ocean drifting to it’s ultimate end. Appel invested a significant amount of funds in this adventure which may ultimately end up at the bottom of the ocean. That said, this was done for a purpose. In this day of “Reality TV” maybe a TV series was expected as the outcome. Her past experience and resume indicate that she is an actress and daredevil motorcyclist. It is apparent that her knowledge of sailing is suspect. I’ve met many sailors who have been sailing for decades but have never sailed through a thunderstorm and wouldn’t know what to do if caught in one. It appears that her story was created to impress those people who have never sailed and would be enamored with her adventures because of her alleged bravery and heroism. It does make you wonder about all the stories we’ve heard about heroism in wars and other points in history. Our lack of knowledge in various aspects of life allows us to romanticize those events and take fiction as fact. Example – With a slingshot, David took down a giant named Goliath or Noah built an ark that held 2 of every animal life on the planet.

  46. I loved your story! It made me laugh even though I do not know a thing about sailing .

  47. I recently crossed the South Atlantic 4500 nm on a row boat from Cape Town to Rio Brazil. unassisted. The crossing took 92 days and even with the best nutrition available, we still were in poor physical condition when we arrived. Desalinated sea water is pure H2O, the human body cannot survive on that and synthisise food without taking appropriate mineral supplements. Something does not add up in my opinion.

  48. I’m not a sailor but a mountaineer and I didn’t believe one word of their story as it came out. Great read, I had a few more laughs at some of the details I didn’t know, like the shark attack!

  49. They must have packed a healthy supply of weed as well as oatmeal to have come up with this story.

Leave a reply to NomNomNom Cancel reply